2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-020-04291-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Analysis of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Using Simultaneous High-Speed Infrared and X-ray Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This emissivity exactly matched the one presented in Gould et al . ’s work 59 . Based on this method, the emissivity of 410 SS is estimated to be ε = 0.13.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This emissivity exactly matched the one presented in Gould et al . ’s work 59 . Based on this method, the emissivity of 410 SS is estimated to be ε = 0.13.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their device's spatial and temporal resolutions (X-ray: 45 μm/pix with 500 Hz framerate, pyrometer: 13.3 μm/pix with 50 Hz framerate) were not high enough to observe rapid thermal and geometry changes. Gould et al 59 synchronized high-speed X-ray imaging with high-speed IR imaging to study L-PBF processes in real-time. They observed the phenomena during the melting and solidification processes such as vapor plums and spatter, quantified the thermal history and cooling rates, and demonstrated the concept of using synchronized high-speed X-ray and IR imaging to monitor the melt pool in L-PBF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pores are the major defect in parts printed by LPBF AM, which adversely affect the mechanical properties [7], especially fatigue life [8]. While pore formation during the CW-LPBF process has been studied extensively with post-processing diagnostic techniques [9], in-situ X-ray imaging techniques [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and high fidelity simulations [13], research on pore formation and its underlying mechanisms during PW-LPBF is limited. Therefore, it is important to implement in-situ diagnostic tools, such as state-of-the-art in situ x-ray imaging techniques, to perform fundamental studies on pore formation during the PW-LPBF process in real time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process, most defects are formed during the dynamic melting process, when the laser interacts with the solid and the melt pool [2,3]. The AM community distinguishes between lack of fusion pores, which are flat and irregular pores (voids) between non-fused powder layers, keyhole pores, which are irregular pores (voids) created by the laser and a high energy input, and gas pores, which are mostly spherical pores formed by adding gas to the melt pool [2,[4][5][6][7][8]. A detailed review of pores and voids created during the AM build process was recently published by Sola et al [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%