Artificial pit electrodes of types 304 and 316 stainless steels ͑304SS and 316SS͒ have been used to determine transition potentials for salt-film formation ͑E T ͒ as a function of the anodic limiting current density ͑i lim ͒, a procedure introduced by Laycock and Newman. Plots of E T vs log i lim are normally straight lines, and when extrapolated to a current density typical of an initiating pit, provide a model of the pitting potential. NaBr and NaCl solutions were compared using this procedure. It was found that the slope of the E T vs log i lim plot was higher for 316SS than 304SS in chloride solution, but higher for 304SS than 316SS in bromide solution. Thus, in bromide solutions, the anodic kinetics of 304SS and 316SS become the same at an anodic current density of several A/cm 2 . This set of observations can explain the absence of the usual beneficial effect of alloyed Mo on the stable pitting potential in bromide solution. On the other hand, metastable pits, which grow more slowly than stable pits, do show an inhibiting effect of alloyed Mo, in bromide as well as in chloride. The literature on comparative effects of halides on aqueous molybdenum chemistry has been reviewed, but no definite conclusions can be drawn. It is considered unlikely that the possible breakup of large polymolybdates by bromide is the underlying reason for the kinetic effects observed. Complexation of a low oxidation state of Mo is more likely.It has been known since the 1930s that the effect of bromide solutions on stainless steel is different from that of chloride solutions. In particular, alloyed molybdenum provides much less extra resistance to pitting corrosion in bromide solutions than in chloride solutions. 1 The reason for this behavior was sought by Kimura et al. 2 using X-ray absorption spectroscopy performed in situ in 1 M solutions of LiCl and LiBr on artificial "crevice" electrodes made from metal foil mounted in resin ͑since these had one-dimensional transport they were really more like artificial pits͒. The potential used was fairly oxidizing, 0.8 V vs Ag/AgCl, but not unreasonably so. The beam could be placed near the metal interface ͑highly concentrated pit/crevice solution͒ or further away ͑more dilute solution͒. They concluded that the usual beneficial effect of Mo in chloride solution was correlated with the formation of a polymeric molybdate network, and that bromide interfered with this by breaking up such a network; also that bromide formed "hydrobromo" complexes near the metal interface. The latter conclusion arose from the inspection of Fourier-transformed data indicating a shorter nearest-neighbor distance for Br ions in the concentrated solution near the metal interface. The main conclusion, with respect to the state of Mo in the solution, was based on a slight difference in the Mo K-edge absorption spectrum between chloride and bromide solutions. The main focus was on the pre-edge peak that reflects the ͑distorted͒ octahedral form of the MoO 4 ·2H 2 O 2− species and its variants.A closer examination of th...