2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ assessment of superficial moisture condition in façades of historic building using non-destructive techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Karsten tube tests were used to compare the water absorption characteristics of areas covered with mosses, weathered stone without moss, and bare/ unweathered stone (BS EN 16302 2013) This is a wellestablished experiment within the field of cultural heritage used as a proxy measurement for water absorption (Blaeuer, Vergès-Belmin, and Franzen 2012;Hendrickx 2013;Vandevoorde et al 2013;Scatigno et al 2016aScatigno et al , 2016bRuiz, Flores, and Prieto 2019). The measurements took place on-site at Kelmscott Manor using the cementitious mortar capped wall shown in Figure 1, at Chipping Norton using the top of the drystone walling constructed from local ooidal limestone, and in the laboratory environment using the limestone test blocks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karsten tube tests were used to compare the water absorption characteristics of areas covered with mosses, weathered stone without moss, and bare/ unweathered stone (BS EN 16302 2013) This is a wellestablished experiment within the field of cultural heritage used as a proxy measurement for water absorption (Blaeuer, Vergès-Belmin, and Franzen 2012;Hendrickx 2013;Vandevoorde et al 2013;Scatigno et al 2016aScatigno et al , 2016bRuiz, Flores, and Prieto 2019). The measurements took place on-site at Kelmscott Manor using the cementitious mortar capped wall shown in Figure 1, at Chipping Norton using the top of the drystone walling constructed from local ooidal limestone, and in the laboratory environment using the limestone test blocks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be also be used as an indication of moisture [14], although this is primarily limited to near-surface conditions. IRT is often not precise [14,15] but gives a good overview of the masonry moisture pattern. ERT is affected by the presence of salt due to its impact on conductivity [7] and requires different calibration for stone and mortars [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infrared Thermography is an NDT widely employed for quantitative and qualitative evaluations for building diagnostics [55]. In heritage architecture, it constitutes a highly valuable tool since it allows for the analysis of the state of conservation of construction materials without using invasive sampling methods.…”
Section: Infrared Thermography (Irt)mentioning
confidence: 99%