2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ bioremediation of contaminated soils in uranium deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy and carbon sources (or electron acceptors) for microbial metabolism was available in the NA media, but they only existed at a limited amount in the SBS media. Carbon functions not only as an electron donor in cellular metabolism but also as a constitutive element of cells (Groudev et al, 2010). Since the soil bacteria in Point C had higher C content and C/N ratio in their natural environment, their colonies experienced difficulty in adapting to low nutrients, became undeveloped, and survived only until Day 21 in the SBS media.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy and carbon sources (or electron acceptors) for microbial metabolism was available in the NA media, but they only existed at a limited amount in the SBS media. Carbon functions not only as an electron donor in cellular metabolism but also as a constitutive element of cells (Groudev et al, 2010). Since the soil bacteria in Point C had higher C content and C/N ratio in their natural environment, their colonies experienced difficulty in adapting to low nutrients, became undeveloped, and survived only until Day 21 in the SBS media.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, phytoextraction may be ineffective or too length, whereas high-energy thermal treatments or conventional contaminant-removal based treatments are generally expensive and/or produce high-radioactive wastes or wastewater needing landfill disposal. Furthermore, in situ management of contaminated sites is preferable, being potentially less expensive and less risky than ex-situ management (Groudev et al, 2010). In all cases, specific remediation strategies aimed at reducing the doses to local residents, with a focus on external gamma irradiation are strictly recommended (Hardie and McKinley, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial bioremediation has been emerged as an alternative technology to reduce heavy metal concentrations to acceptable levels in the ecosystem and enhance the removal of metals from aqueous systems (Groudev et al, 2010;Kumar et al, 2010). To understand the behavior of complex aquatic and biogeochemical ecosystems, it is vital to study effects of heavy metals to native microorganisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%