Soil and Aquifer Pollution 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-03674-7_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ Bioremediation of Residual Entrapped NAPL in Aquifers by a Biodegradable Nutrient-Surfactant Mix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, combination of physical–chemical source-zone treatment and posttreatment bioremediation may be an attractive remediation alternative, resulting in reduced source longevity and contaminant mass flux ( de Blanc et al 1997 ; Rao et al 2002 ; Zoller 1998 ; Zoller and Rubin 2001 ). Coupling a physical–chemical remediation process that removes significant contaminant mass with a bioremediation “polishing step” to control the contaminant mass flux emanating from remaining DNAPL may provide a synergism that cannot be obtained with existing remediation strategies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, combination of physical–chemical source-zone treatment and posttreatment bioremediation may be an attractive remediation alternative, resulting in reduced source longevity and contaminant mass flux ( de Blanc et al 1997 ; Rao et al 2002 ; Zoller 1998 ; Zoller and Rubin 2001 ). Coupling a physical–chemical remediation process that removes significant contaminant mass with a bioremediation “polishing step” to control the contaminant mass flux emanating from remaining DNAPL may provide a synergism that cannot be obtained with existing remediation strategies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%