1995
DOI: 10.1016/1353-2561(95)00018-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ burning of emulsions R&D in Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the peak in BE appears to be a phenomenon occurring in smallscale testing only. Figure 3 -Diagram of the burning efficiency behaviour based on the current investigation and various studies [21,[36][37][38][39][40]. The current data and data from small-scale (Ø 0.1 to 1.1 m pool diameter) [21,36,38,39] fit curve A where the peak in BE is more pronounced for the smaller pools.…”
Section: The Effect Of Weathering On Bementioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the peak in BE appears to be a phenomenon occurring in smallscale testing only. Figure 3 -Diagram of the burning efficiency behaviour based on the current investigation and various studies [21,[36][37][38][39][40]. The current data and data from small-scale (Ø 0.1 to 1.1 m pool diameter) [21,36,38,39] fit curve A where the peak in BE is more pronounced for the smaller pools.…”
Section: The Effect Of Weathering On Bementioning
confidence: 75%
“…The current data and data from small-scale (Ø 0.1 to 1.1 m pool diameter) [21,36,38,39] fit curve A where the peak in BE is more pronounced for the smaller pools. Curve B is observed across various pool diameters (Ø 0.1 to 9.8 m) [21,[36][37][38]. Other BE data (Ø 0.4 to 1.14 m) [37,40] does not decrease or decrease slightly (and linearly) as a function of the water content, and this behaviour is represented by curve C. Finally, curve D represents data from a meso-scale test in a 1.7 m diameter pool [21].…”
Section: The Effect Of Weathering On Bementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ burning is a countermeasure technology that was first implemented in 1958 along the ice-covered Mackenzie River in Northwest Canada and since then has been used operationally in ice free areas during the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska and extensively in the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico (Beyer et al 2016;Buist, 2004;Hunt, 2009). Burning is a quickly implemented OSR action that requires little infrastructure and, most significantly, is effective, leaving approximately 10% of the original hydrocarbon load (Guenette and Sveum, 1995;Buist, 2004;Buist et al 2013;Fingas, 2016). Burning creates a burned oil residue (BO) that may sink depending on oil characteristics (Fritt-Rasmussen et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, fire size, fuel type, and condition (weathering), as well as environmental conditions, can affect smoke yield. Guénette and Sveum[42] presented some of these factors, specifically slick thickness, the amount of water in the emulsion and the degree of evaporation. Comparison of the PM 2.5 concentrations from our first six sampled burns (average = 69.8 ± 10.0 g PM 2.5 /kg oil c ) with the nine burns done two days later (average = 49.2 ± 10.3 g PM 2.5 /kg oil c )…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%