2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2009.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ catalyst activity control in a novel membrane reactor—Reaction driven wireless electrochemical promotion of catalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that the phenomenon is rapidly reversed upon re-introduction of the Arsweep. This is very different from the behaviour previously [18][19][20][21][22] but similar to that observed for the case of a mixed protonic electronic conductor (Sr 0.97 Ce 0.9 Yb 0.1 O 3 − α ) [23] used for the modification of Pt catalytic activity for ethylene oxidation. In the case of the mixed oxygen-electronic conductor, the catalytic rate remained to the promoted state upon re-introduction of the inert gas sweep, while in the case of the mixed protonoxygen ion conductor, there was also a rapid restoration.…”
Section: Chemical Stability In Co 2 Atmospherescontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is interesting to note that the phenomenon is rapidly reversed upon re-introduction of the Arsweep. This is very different from the behaviour previously [18][19][20][21][22] but similar to that observed for the case of a mixed protonic electronic conductor (Sr 0.97 Ce 0.9 Yb 0.1 O 3 − α ) [23] used for the modification of Pt catalytic activity for ethylene oxidation. In the case of the mixed oxygen-electronic conductor, the catalytic rate remained to the promoted state upon re-introduction of the inert gas sweep, while in the case of the mixed protonoxygen ion conductor, there was also a rapid restoration.…”
Section: Chemical Stability In Co 2 Atmospherescontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Upon introduction of the H 2 /H 2 O flow on the sweep side of the reactor, a chemical potential difference of hydrogen species across the membrane is created. This will act as the driving force for these species to migrate across the membrane and spillover on the catalyst surface to impose a similar modification to the catalytic rate as in classic EPOC [18][19][20]. The effect on the catalytic rate (promotion or poisoning) depends on the nature of the promoting species (electronegative and electropositive) and the adsorption status of the reactants.…”
Section: Chemical Stability In Co 2 Atmospheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…36 Such a change in the WF alters the activation energy of the reaction, resulting in improved thermalcatalytic performance in a reversible manner compared to that without the applied voltage. [39][40][41][42] As one example, the hydrogenation of CO 2 over Ru deposited on a proton-conducting oxide (BaZr 0.85 Y 0.15 O 3Àa + 1 wt% NiO) has been investigated. 41,43 Their study showed that positively polarizing the WF removed the proton promoter and, in turn, enhanced thermal-catalytic CH 4 formation and suppressed the CO formation rate, while negatively polarizing the WF resulted in an opposite manner.…”
Section: Approaches To Alter the Potential Of A Solid Catalyst For Hementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poulidi et al [12] used membrane reactors for "wireless" electrochemical promotion. They employed a dual chamber membrane reactor for the control of catalyst activity.…”
Section: A Conductive Membranes Used In Rf Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%