2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01715.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ characterization of nitrifiers in an activated sludge plant: detection of Nitrobacter Spp.

Abstract: Aims: The purpose of this work was to investigate microbial ecology of nitrifiers at the genus level in a typical full-scale activated sludge plant. Methods and Results: Grab samples of mixed liquor were collected from a plug-flow reactor receiving domestic wastewater. Fluorescent in situ hybridization technique (FISH) was used to characterize both ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in combination with Confocal Scanning Laser Microscope (CSLM). Fluorescently labelled, 16S rRN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Average ammonia concentrations entering the lane were 15.3 mg/L, with most of nitrification taking place by zone 6 (Fig.2).In-lane measurements during the pre-assessment period showed the majority of the oxidised nitrogen was in nitrate form (average 12 mgN/L), with limited to undetectable nitrite in lane (average 0.3 mgN/L). This is consistent with what is expected in a full-scale nitrifying ASP (Coskuner and Curtis, 2002). The operational conditions were measured during the study and used to assess the relationship between emissions and the environmental conditions (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Average ammonia concentrations entering the lane were 15.3 mg/L, with most of nitrification taking place by zone 6 (Fig.2).In-lane measurements during the pre-assessment period showed the majority of the oxidised nitrogen was in nitrate form (average 12 mgN/L), with limited to undetectable nitrite in lane (average 0.3 mgN/L). This is consistent with what is expected in a full-scale nitrifying ASP (Coskuner and Curtis, 2002). The operational conditions were measured during the study and used to assess the relationship between emissions and the environmental conditions (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…On the other hand, Nitrobacter has a higher K S for nitrite. Therefore, in environments with high concentrations of nitrogen, Nitrobacter is frequently found to be the dominant NOB [10]. In our study, the ratio between populations of Nitrospira and Nitrobacter varied from 5.2 to 13.4; Nitrospira showed evident dominance in population concentration compared with Nitrobacter, which was identical to many result [8,31,36,37].…”
Section: Dominant Nitrifying Bacteria and Major Controlling Factorssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The current use of molecular techniques that do not require the isolation and cultivation of microorganisms (1,33), including 16S rRNA analysis (6,13,20) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (8), have greatly expanded our understanding of wastewater microbial communities. Researchers have identified many bacteria of importance to wastewater treatment, including the bacteria involved in biological phosphorus removal (5,16,29), nitrifiers (8,19,25), denitrifiers (3,12,17), and methanogens (18,36). Molecular techniques have also improved our understanding of fundamental processes such as nitrification and denitrification, as well as plant upsets, such as foaming (9,24), which can decrease treatment efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%