2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ deposition of three-dimensional graphene on selective laser melted copper scaffolds for high performance applications

Abstract: Currently, three-dimensional graphene (3DG) fabrication was restricted by the complicated process, strict chemical reactions as well as structural accuracy. Herein we creatively propose a bottom-up strategy that leverages selective laser melting (SLM) technique to manufacture a three-dimensional (3D) porous copper template. Graphene was then in-situ grown via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) on the obtained template, forming 3DG composites. A combination of conventional graphene growth via CVD technique with SL… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, CVD technology is complex and costly, and cannot continuously prepare CNF for a long time, this makes it difficult to build a conductive system. [80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87] CNF prepared by has been used for EMI protection, but its volume is large, EMI shielding performance is not enough, and its flexibility is poor. In addition, the CVD method is complex and costly, and cannot generate continuous long CNF, which is essential for constructing conductive CNF networks.…”
Section: The Advantages and Challenges Of Carbon-based Emi Shielding ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, CVD technology is complex and costly, and cannot continuously prepare CNF for a long time, this makes it difficult to build a conductive system. [80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87] CNF prepared by has been used for EMI protection, but its volume is large, EMI shielding performance is not enough, and its flexibility is poor. In addition, the CVD method is complex and costly, and cannot generate continuous long CNF, which is essential for constructing conductive CNF networks.…”
Section: The Advantages and Challenges Of Carbon-based Emi Shielding ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, inspired by the application of template-directed CVD in synthesis of 3D foam-like graphene foams (3D-GFs) [62], a 3D porous Cu scaffolds made by AM was used as substrate putting into the vacuum chamber during fabrication of graphene/MMCs. Excepting for the enhanced thermal diffusion, the unexpected higher electromagnetic interference shielding and the specially designed porous structure were obtained [63]. Although many metal materials, such as Cu, Pt, Ni, Fe etc are used as substrate in CVD to obtain graphene with large quantity and good quality, Cu is the best choice with high stability and is suitable for industrialization.…”
Section: In-situ Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to its exceptional properties such as remarkable electron mobility, thermal conductivity, exceptional mechanical flexibility, and immense specific surface area, graphene, a two-dimensional honeycomb carbon structure, has been widely utilized in ceramic, polymer, or metallic matrix for the development of advanced composites with remarkable mechanical, electrical, and thermal characteristics. However, exploiting the unique properties of graphene in copper matrix composites presents a colossal challenge due to the tendency of graphene nanosheets (GNSs) to stack and agglomerate, as well as the density difference between graphene and the copper matrix. Besides, the equilibrium contact angle of copper on graphene or graphite was measured to be approximately 140°, indicating a nonwetting feature of the interface between copper and graphene, according to the Young–Dupré equation, as well as easy agglomeration of graphene and poor interfacial bonding in the sintered copper matrix. , Consequently, considerable research on graphene-reinforced copper matrix composites has been conducted with the aim of hindering restacking of graphene and achieving homogeneous dispersion of graphene in the copper matrix. Hwang et al constructed homogeneously distributed graphene/Cu composites with an enhanced elastic modulus of 131 GPa and yield strength of 284 MPa via molecular-level mixing (MLM) and spark plasma sintering (SPS) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%