2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05864-7_206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Detection of Non-metallic Inclusions in Aluminum Melt (1xxx)—Comparison Between a Newly Developed Ultrasonic Technique and LiMCA and PoDFA Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The metallographic method, while simple, requires lengthy sampling, making it suitable for small-scale detection. PoDFA offers both qualitative and quantitative detection but suffers from low efficiency and high costs [10][11][12]. The K-mold method detects 60-80 µm inclusions but yields biased results for cleaner molten metals [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metallographic method, while simple, requires lengthy sampling, making it suitable for small-scale detection. PoDFA offers both qualitative and quantitative detection but suffers from low efficiency and high costs [10][11][12]. The K-mold method detects 60-80 µm inclusions but yields biased results for cleaner molten metals [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical application, non-metallic inclusions—especially macro-inclusions—in the metal matrix are closely relevant with the fatigue cracks, seriously affecting the performance of metal. Therefore, a thorough understanding and reasonable control of the non-metallic inclusions in the metal matrix through characterizing their sizes, morphologies, chemical compositions, spatial distribution, etc., becomes essential for clean metal production [ 8 , 9 ]. To characterize the inclusions accurately concerning the complex morphologies and distribution in the metal matrix, many different methods are developed to obtain the representative characteristics of inclusions [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%