2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ electrochemical microcantilever bending test: A new insight into hydrogen enhanced cracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model fits very well with our observations. Another interesting idea was introduced recently by Hajilou et al [24]. The authors found similar plasticity suppression during the bending test using micro-sized cantilever of Fe-3%Si alloy under in-situ electrochemical hydrogen-charging.…”
Section: Dislocation Structures Characterized By Temmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This model fits very well with our observations. Another interesting idea was introduced recently by Hajilou et al [24]. The authors found similar plasticity suppression during the bending test using micro-sized cantilever of Fe-3%Si alloy under in-situ electrochemical hydrogen-charging.…”
Section: Dislocation Structures Characterized By Temmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In addition, the local H concentration, C σ , of the highly stressed regions in the DCB sample can be estimated using the following equation [46]: Cσ=C0exp(σhVH/RT) where C 0 is the diffusion H concentration, σ h is the hydrostatic stress, V H is the partial molar volume of H in iron (2.1 × 10 −6 m 3 /mol), R is the gas constant and T is the ambient temperature. As this equation indicates, C σ decreased as the result of decreased C 0 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GNDs are regarded as the fingerprint of deformation. [44][45] In TEM investigations these appear as the hotspots of strain localization in the material, typically known by cell or microband nomenclature. 46 Although, a comparison between the phase and KAM maps (Figures 9[b] and [d]) indicated that the GND boundaries, which arise due to deformation, were present in both phases, qualitatively, they seem to form predominantly within austenite.…”
Section: Fractographymentioning
confidence: 99%