2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ estimation of water quality parameters in freshwater aquaculture ponds using hyperspectral imaging system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…was obtained from the model of cross band ratio algorithm with six wavelengths than the other three algorithms because optimal wavelengths provided potential indication of water quality status in different The ability to predict Chl-a concentration by the model of cross band ratio algorithm with six wavelengths was better than those of two-band and three-band models (r 2 = 0.833, 078 and 0.862, 0.82, respectively), which were obtained by Abd-Elrahman et al [21] with a mobile, ground-based hyperspectral imaging sensor in working aquaculture ponds and by Cheng et al [22] with a similar field system in turbid lake water, respectively. In addition, the performance (r 2 = 0.88) for Chl-a estimation in turbid inland water by Song et al [49] was lower than that of the optimal wavelengths model in the current study.…”
Section: Prediction Of Chl-a Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…was obtained from the model of cross band ratio algorithm with six wavelengths than the other three algorithms because optimal wavelengths provided potential indication of water quality status in different The ability to predict Chl-a concentration by the model of cross band ratio algorithm with six wavelengths was better than those of two-band and three-band models (r 2 = 0.833, 078 and 0.862, 0.82, respectively), which were obtained by Abd-Elrahman et al [21] with a mobile, ground-based hyperspectral imaging sensor in working aquaculture ponds and by Cheng et al [22] with a similar field system in turbid lake water, respectively. In addition, the performance (r 2 = 0.88) for Chl-a estimation in turbid inland water by Song et al [49] was lower than that of the optimal wavelengths model in the current study.…”
Section: Prediction Of Chl-a Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…(I) A two-band ratio approach in the form of R λ2 /R λ1 [21,45,46,47,48] , where λ1 is located around the phytoplankton absorption peak, and λ 2 is normally located between 700 and 720 nm [48] . Then, the R λ ratio can be calculated as:…”
Section: Development Of Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These remote sensing (RS) methods promise to be suitable for estimating WQPs in turbid waters over a large area several times a year; including chl-a (Sokoletsky et al 2011;Yacobi et al 2011;Shi et al 2013), prediction of phytoplankton species (Randolph et al 2008) and their biomass (Abd-Elrahman et al 2011), and/or TSS (Doxaran et al 2005Sterckx et al 2007;Ouillon et al 2008). Moreover, the spatial diversity within an individual water body can be evaluated and a time series can be obtained (Sudduth et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%