2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2017.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ experimental investigation of basalt spalling in a large underground powerhouse cavern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The inner surfaces of a borehole might crack or peel off when the stress reaches a certain level. Such occurrences can also be used to determine the direction of the stress [17,18,19]. In our validation of the system, we used it to observe this borehole, and found the existence of cracks at 20 m (see Fig.…”
Section: Analyses Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inner surfaces of a borehole might crack or peel off when the stress reaches a certain level. Such occurrences can also be used to determine the direction of the stress [17,18,19]. In our validation of the system, we used it to observe this borehole, and found the existence of cracks at 20 m (see Fig.…”
Section: Analyses Of the Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spalling and rockburst are two common failure modes in deep hard-rock tunnels [7,8]. Rock spalling, embodied as parallel fractures close to the free surface, is a tensional and brittle splitting failure process with no obvious ejection performance [2,9,10]. Different from the static failure mode of spalling, rockburst is a kind of artificial earthquake induced by human activities, such as mining excavations [4-6, 11, 12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although great progress has been made in studying the microscopic mechanisms of rock specimens (Tang et al, 2001;Liu et al, 2002;Fang et al, 2002;Sahouryeh et al, 2002;Dyskin et al, 2003), laboratory or field experiments (Bauch et al, 2004;Wong et al, 2004;Li et al, 2011;Jiang et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2017;Gong et al, 2012;Gong et al, 2018) and numerical simulations (Zhu et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2016;Sharif et al, 2019;Wowk et al, 2019), so far there is no widely accepted theoretical explanation for splitting failure, and further improvement of theoretical methods is still needed. In this paper, the 3D geomechanical model test of splitting failure is firstly introduced, and the variations of displacement and stress around the high sidewall cavern are given.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%