2018
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201803666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Fabrication of Heterostructure on Nickel Foam with Tuned Composition for Enhancing Water‐Splitting Performance

Abstract: for fossil fuels. Electrocatalytic water splitting is a promising and environmentally friendly approach for the generation of hydrogen gas with high quality and efficiency. [1][2][3][4] However, the electrochemical hydrogen production is seriously limited by the large overpotential and sluggish kinetics of both cathodic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER). [5][6][7] At present, noble metals (e.g., Pt, Ir, and Ru) based catalysts are regarded as the best electrocatalysts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure E, the CoP‐Co 2 P@PC/PG NHs have the smallest Tafel slope (66 mV dec −1 ), and thereby their OER rate can increase quickly with the increase of potential. It should be mentioned that the OER activity of CoP‐Co 2 P@PC/PG NHs is also superior to CoP‐Co 2 P@PC NHs (Figure S19, Supporting Information), and most of recently reported OER catalysts, such as NiCoP‐NWAs/NF, Co 4 N/CNW/CC, Ni 3 (S 0.25 Se 0.75 ) 2 @NiOOH, and so on. The detailed comparison is given in Table S2 (Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As shown in Figure E, the CoP‐Co 2 P@PC/PG NHs have the smallest Tafel slope (66 mV dec −1 ), and thereby their OER rate can increase quickly with the increase of potential. It should be mentioned that the OER activity of CoP‐Co 2 P@PC/PG NHs is also superior to CoP‐Co 2 P@PC NHs (Figure S19, Supporting Information), and most of recently reported OER catalysts, such as NiCoP‐NWAs/NF, Co 4 N/CNW/CC, Ni 3 (S 0.25 Se 0.75 ) 2 @NiOOH, and so on. The detailed comparison is given in Table S2 (Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, many efforts have been devoted to design and fabricate nonprecious metal electrocatalysts for HER. Over the past few years, nonprecious metal–based electrocatalysts such as transition metal sulphides, selenide, nitrides, phosphides, and carbides have been developed as good candidates for HER.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the scarcity, high cost and poor durability seriously hamper large-scale application of noble metal-based materials. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Recently, due to the low cost and earth-abundant reserves, many efforts have been made to develop high activity non-noble metal based electrocatalysts. Non-noble transition metals such as Fe, Co, Ni and Mn have attracted a lot of attention, and the compounds of transition-metals have been suggested as replaceable electrocatalysts in OER.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%