2024
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c19174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Flash Synthesis of Ultra-High-Performance Metal Oxide Anode through Shunting Current-Based Electrothermal Shock

Yan Wu,
Qi Qi,
Tianlang Peng
et al.

Abstract: The synthesis of anode materials plays an important role in determining the production efficiency, cost, and performance of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, a low-cost, high-speed, scalable manufacturing process of the anode with the desired structural feature for practical technology adoption remains elusive. In this study, we propose a novel method called in situ flash shuntelectrothermal shock (SETS) which is controllable, fast, and energy-saving for synthesizing metal oxide-based materials. By using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UPS analysis yielded cutoff energies ( E cutoff ) of 16.47 and 17.38 eV for Mo 2 S 3 and CuInS 2 , respectively, as depicted in Figure S9a,b. Using the formula W f = 21.22 eV – E cutoff , the work functions for of Mo 2 S 3 and CuInS 2 are 4.75 and 3.84 eV, respectively. A higher work function implies a stronger ability to bind electrons, indicating that Mo 2 S 3 has a pronounced tendency to accumulate electrons compared with CuInS 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UPS analysis yielded cutoff energies ( E cutoff ) of 16.47 and 17.38 eV for Mo 2 S 3 and CuInS 2 , respectively, as depicted in Figure S9a,b. Using the formula W f = 21.22 eV – E cutoff , the work functions for of Mo 2 S 3 and CuInS 2 are 4.75 and 3.84 eV, respectively. A higher work function implies a stronger ability to bind electrons, indicating that Mo 2 S 3 has a pronounced tendency to accumulate electrons compared with CuInS 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%