1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2728(1997)9:4<175::aid-lra3>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ flow-injection monitoring of ammonia in landfill leachate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both baseline stability and reproducibility were excellent with typical RSDs (n ‫ס‬ 3) of Ͻ2%. It is possible to thermostat the instrumentation [8] to provide a stable response, but for this field trial a 5 mg L ‫1מ‬ NO 3 -N standard was used as a reference for all daytime samples. With few exceptions, reproducibility between replicate injections was Ͻ2% RSD (n ‫ס‬ 3), pooled (all three calibrations) RSDs were Ͻ4% (n ‫ס‬ 9), and linear correlation coefficients for all calibrations were good (pooled result: r 2 ‫ס‬ 0.9998, n ‫ס‬ 6).…”
Section: River Frome Field Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both baseline stability and reproducibility were excellent with typical RSDs (n ‫ס‬ 3) of Ͻ2%. It is possible to thermostat the instrumentation [8] to provide a stable response, but for this field trial a 5 mg L ‫1מ‬ NO 3 -N standard was used as a reference for all daytime samples. With few exceptions, reproducibility between replicate injections was Ͻ2% RSD (n ‫ס‬ 3), pooled (all three calibrations) RSDs were Ͻ4% (n ‫ס‬ 9), and linear correlation coefficients for all calibrations were good (pooled result: r 2 ‫ס‬ 0.9998, n ‫ס‬ 6).…”
Section: River Frome Field Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%