to achieve further improved performance. As a result, the energy density of LIBs has continuously increased at a rate of 7-8 Wh kg −1 year −1 , already passing 250 Wh kg −1 at cell level (for 18650type cells). Simultaneously, the overall cost decreased substantially from initially around 1000 € kWh −1 to less than 200 € kWh −1 , [5] while a further reduction to less than 150 € kWh −1 is anticipated within the next 5 to 10 years [6] -or, in fact, might have been realized already following some recent newspaper articles. Nonetheless, further improvement is required for realizing a fully electrified transportation sector and eventually succeeding in transitioning to renewable energy sources only. For this reason, there is a great quest for alternative inactive and active materials, including inter alia the anode-not least because graphite, the state-of-theart for LIBs, which is intrinsically limiting the fast charging of the full-cell. [7,8] Another important concern is related to the availability of the required elements, including inter alia lithium, [9,10] which has led to a rapidly increasing interest in alternative charge carriers-in particular, sodium. [11][12][13] In fact, the two technologies share several similarities and, hence, room-temperature SIBs are considered a "drop-in technology," as many of the achievements obtained for LIBs can be readily implemented for SIBs. This has resulted in rapid progress for the development of SIBs within only a few years. However, there are some fundamental differences between the two systems due to the different charge carriers such as the size of the cation, the standard redox potential, or simply the different cost for the corresponding precursors-as summarized briefly in Table 1. These affect, respectively, the diffusion and transport properties, the maximum achievable energy density, or the price of the cell. Furthermore, the different reactivity of the two systems eventually also has an effect on the (decomposition) reactions at the interface between the electrode and the electrolyte, including the charge transfer and cation desolvation, before entering the host structure. With respect to the potential host structure for the negative electrode-or in other words the electrode active material-the material classes of choice are frequently carbons (e.g., graphite or hard carbons) or metal oxides. For the latter, there are essentially three different alkali cation storage mechanisms: (i) insertion (including intercalation in case of layered structures), (ii) alloying, and (iii) conversion. In case of (i) insertion-type materials, the Li + Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) with outstanding energy and power density have been extensively investigated in recent years, rendering them the most suitable energy storage technology for application in emerging markets such as electric vehicles and stationary storage. More recently, sodium, one of the most abundant elements on earth, exhibiting similar physicochemical properties as lithium, has been gaining increasing attention for the ...