In-Situ LA-ICP-MS Uraninite U–Pb Dating and Genesis of the Datian Migmatite-Hosted Uranium Deposit, South China

Abstract

The Datian uranium deposit is a migmatite-hosted, high temperature, hydrothermal deposit in the Kangdian region. Detailed information on the chemical composition and formation age of the uraninite remains lacking, which impedes our understanding of uraninite genesis. Two phases of uraninite have been identified according to their relationships with other minerals and their field relationships. The phase 1 (Ur1) uraninite is characterized by local development of microfractures and pores in the crystal of uraninite, a scattered distribution, and irregular crystal shapes, and it is associated with ilmenite, biotite, and rare earth element (REE) minerals (monazite and xenotime). The phase 2 uraninite (Ur2) has anhedral crystal shapes with well-developed microfractures and pores and is associated with pyrite, albite, pyrrhotite, molybdenite, zircon, and chlorite. X-ray element mapping revealed that the distributions of U, Th, and Pb in the Ur1 uraninite are homogeneous, whereas those in the Ur2 uraninite are heterogeneous. The results of the electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) show that the UO2 and PbO contents of the Ur1 and Ur2 uraninite do not vary significantly. The high ThO2 contents of the Ur1 (1.08–1.68 wt %) and Ur2 uraninite (3.41–4.83 wt %) indicate that they formed at different temperatures. The laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) analysis results show that the ∑REE of the Ur1 uraninite (3747.5–7032.3 ppm) is lower than that of the Ur2 uraninite (8369.2–11,484.3 ppm), and the REE patterns of the Ur1 and Ur2 uraninite are sickle-shaped with large negative Eu anomalies. The LA-ICP-MS U–Pb dating results revealed that the ages of the Ur1 (841.4 ± 4.0 Ma) and Ur2 (834.5 ± 4.1 Ma–837.2 ± 4.5 Ma) uraninite are in consistent with that of the migmatite. Thus, the Datian uranium deposit underwent at least two hydrothermal events, and the uraninite was formed due to the migmatization.

A Review of the Genetic Mechanism of Megacrystalline Uraninite in the Kangdian Region, China

“…Xiang et al [31] conducted in situ LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating on titanite, a mineral coexisting with uraninite in felsic veins at the A19 uranium occurrence and obtained a weighted average age of 778 ± 12 Ma (MSWD = 0.096) (Figure 6a). (2) Datian 505 uranium deposit (Table 1): Cheng et al [38] used the LA-ICP-MS method to test the U-Pb age of uraninite in the borehole of Metallogenic belt I, obtaining an age of 839 Ma. Yin [35] calculated the formation age of uraninite (Metallogenic belt I) based on the EPMA data from Cheng et al [38] to be 769 ± 15 Ma.…”

“…(2) Datian 505 uranium deposit (Table 1): Cheng et al [38] used the LA-ICP-MS method to test the U-Pb age of uraninite in the borehole of Metallogenic belt I, obtaining an age of 839 Ma. Yin [35] calculated the formation age of uraninite (Metallogenic belt I) based on the EPMA data from Cheng et al [38] to be 769 ± 15 Ma. Xu et al [39] used the LA-ICP-MS method to test the U-Pb age of monazite, a mineral coexisting with uraninite, in the borehole of Metallogenic belt I, obtaining an age of 769.8 ± 9.7 Ma (Figure 6b).…”

Mineral Chemistry and Chronology Investigation of Uraninite in the Jinguanchong Uranium Deposit in Eastern Hunan Province and the Implications for Geological Significance

“…It can provide multiple age data of a mineral in the microscale range and effectively constrain and reflect the metallogenic age of uranium deposits. 11,12 The Jinguanchong uranium deposit (JUD) is located within the boundaries of Xintai Village, Hejiaqiao Township, Liling City; Shuangfu Village, Daqiao Township, You County; and Hunan Province, China. It belongs to the Mingyuefeng ore field in the eastern Hunan Province.…”

“…The in situ U–Pb dating technology has various advantages compared to the traditional uranium mineral dating method such as a high spatial resolution and minimal sample consumption. It can provide multiple age data of a mineral in the microscale range and effectively constrain and reflect the metallogenic age of uranium deposits. , …”

“…It can provide multiple age data of a mineral in the microscale range and effectively constrain and reflect the metallogenic age of uranium deposits. 11 , 12 …”