2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ measurement of relative motion during ultrasonic spot welding of aluminum alloy using Photonic Doppler Velocimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lu et al . 6 and Fujii et al . 7 presented that dynamic recrystallization might occur concurrently during ultrasonic welding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Lu et al . 6 and Fujii et al . 7 presented that dynamic recrystallization might occur concurrently during ultrasonic welding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The aforementioned interfacial phenomena are closely related to the relative motions of the bonding materials; moreover, the relative motion between the tool and the bonding material in contact with the tool surface is an important factor in ultrasonic bonding. A few researchers have observed the relative motion behavior by means of image correlation [17] and photonic Doppler velocimetry [18]. These studies have revealed that the interface at which relative motion occurs between materials changes to the interface between the tool tip and the materials as the bonding time increases, and the relative motion between the tool tip and the bonding material significantly influences bonding quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to parameters set in the welding machine control, workpiece-dependent and further machine-dependent influences have been described and their influence studied [2,6,7,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Further machine-dependent influences include characteristics as the welding frequency, maximum welding power, amplitude and pressure range, horn and anvil geometry respectively their surface design [11,12]. Also, Fig.…”
Section: Joint Formation and Influences On The Processmentioning
confidence: 99%