2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ measurement of the shrinkage during microwave sintering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparing the volumetric contraction of the samples also obtained from these two sintering methods, Marinel and Savary [19] also found similar results to those previously reported, however they evaluated copper oxide.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In comparing the volumetric contraction of the samples also obtained from these two sintering methods, Marinel and Savary [19] also found similar results to those previously reported, however they evaluated copper oxide.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However pyrometric measurement requires a calibration procedure, which can be tricky in the case of a microwave oven. Different methods, such as optical dilatometry or telemetry [14][15][16], have been proposed to measure specimen shrinkage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patents on microwave dilatometry date back to 1994 and were developed by Kimrey et al [23]; these instruments used a contact method for measuring thermal dilation. Most recent work by Marinel et al [24] and Barber et al [25] used non-contact methods. The dilatometer set-up developed for this study used a push-rod assembly (see Figure 1) due to ease of availability and to avoid issues with emissivity, which is a function of temperature.…”
Section: Microwave Hybrid Dilatometrymentioning
confidence: 99%