1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00033-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ measurement of the vertical linear shrinkage curve of soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies by Jamison and Thompson (1967), Yaalon and Kalmar (1978), Bauer et al (1993), Cheng and Pettry (1993) and Coquet (1998) have observed changes in layer thickness and crack volume during the year. Ritchie et al (1972) assessed soil shrinkage/water content relationships in small and large cores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Studies by Jamison and Thompson (1967), Yaalon and Kalmar (1978), Bauer et al (1993), Cheng and Pettry (1993) and Coquet (1998) have observed changes in layer thickness and crack volume during the year. Ritchie et al (1972) assessed soil shrinkage/water content relationships in small and large cores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a survey of UK piping, Jones et al (1997) found that 70% of piping was located on the Histosols of upland rural areas, mostly peats and organic soils with high winter rainfall acceptance potential (WRAP classes 5 and 2), having a capacity to shrink and crack (Coquet, 1998), and with distinctive subsurface impermeability discontinuities which focus pipe flow . Jones et al (1997) argued that as much as one-third of UK agricultural land could be affected.…”
Section: Piping In Histosols and Gleysols Of Upland Rural Areas In Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulk density changes were observed for a wide range of soil types when using the tensiometer method (Boivin et al, 2004;Boivin et al, 2006a;Braudeau et al, 2005;Chertkov, 2003;Coquet, 1998). Bulk density was also found to increase from 1.16 to 1.77 g cm − 3 for a loam soil, based on the pressure plate method (Lu et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%