2007
DOI: 10.1029/2006jf000655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ measurements of the thermal properties of a northern peatland: Implications for peatland temperature models

Abstract: [1] Carbon uptake/release in peat soils (the latter especially in the form of methane) is strongly dependent on soil temperature. However, previous peatland temperature models have not represented soil temperatures accurately due to either errors in their parameterization or errors in the representation of heat transfer processes. Dual probe heat pulse sensors (DPHPS) and triple-probe heat pulse sensors (TPHPS) were used to provide detailed in situ measurements of the soil thermal properties of Sphagnum peat a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sharratt (1997) measured in situ thermal conductivity in black spruce forests of interior Alaska and reported values for relatively dry moss ranging from 0.03 to 0.09 W m j1 K j1 over the growing season, which are consistent with our measurements at low moisture content (G20% by volume). Minimum K t values measured in this study are also consistent with in situ thermal conductivity measurements of Sphagnum peat by Kettridge and Baird (2007). Our results are also in a good agreement with the estimates of Romanovsky and Osterkamp (2000 ; Table 1) based on interpretation of high-resolution and high-precision temperature measurements from a black spruce forest site in the Bonanza Creek LTER research area (0.1 W m j1 K j1 for the living moss, 0.3 W m j1 K j1 for the dead moss, and 0.5 W m j1 K j1 for the peat layer).…”
Section: Controls On Thermal Conductivity Of Organic Horizonssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Sharratt (1997) measured in situ thermal conductivity in black spruce forests of interior Alaska and reported values for relatively dry moss ranging from 0.03 to 0.09 W m j1 K j1 over the growing season, which are consistent with our measurements at low moisture content (G20% by volume). Minimum K t values measured in this study are also consistent with in situ thermal conductivity measurements of Sphagnum peat by Kettridge and Baird (2007). Our results are also in a good agreement with the estimates of Romanovsky and Osterkamp (2000 ; Table 1) based on interpretation of high-resolution and high-precision temperature measurements from a black spruce forest site in the Bonanza Creek LTER research area (0.1 W m j1 K j1 for the living moss, 0.3 W m j1 K j1 for the dead moss, and 0.5 W m j1 K j1 for the peat layer).…”
Section: Controls On Thermal Conductivity Of Organic Horizonssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The thermal conductivity, including allowance for vapor flux, is calculated from Farouki [1986]: where P is the porosity, θ is the volumetric moisture content, f o is the volumetric fraction of organic matter, and the subscripts a , o and w indicators of air, organic matter and water respectively. Values of k o and k w are assumed to be 0.25 and 0.59 W m 1 K 1 , respectively, and k a combines the conduction and advective vapor component and is given by: The vertical variation in the volumetric heat capacity C (J m 3 K 1 ) is calculated by summing the soil constituents multiplied by their respective heat capacities, with the volumetric moisture content simulated from the preferred capillary rise model presented in Kettridge and Baird [2007].…”
Section: Overview Of Hip Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the unsaturated zone, water is transported downwards for short periods during and after rainfall events (up to 24 hours; Kettridge & Baird, 2007). During drier periods water is also transported to the Sphagnum surface to supply that lost via evapotranspiration (Yazaki et al , 2006; Kettridge & Baird, 2007). In comparison, in the saturated zone, vertical hydraulic gradients are thought to be minimal in the shallow peat profile simulated in this study.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertical variation in the volumetric heat capacity C (J m −3 K −1 ) was simulated from the modified Granberg Model (ModGberg model) described in Kettridge & Baird (2007). Briefly, this model is an empirical representation of the vertical variations in soil water content in Sphagnum peats presented by Hayward & Clymo (1982).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%