1984
DOI: 10.1139/f84-110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Measures of Dissolved Organic Carbon Flux in a Rural Stream

Abstract: Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) dynamics were measured in a second-order stream located in a pasture in southeastern Pennsylvania. In situ measurements made at six stations in early summer showed a diel patern of net DOC release from the streambed communities with predawn minima and afternoon maxima. When an 18-m section of the stream was covered with black plastic for 1 mo to exclude algal growth and measures were repeated in late summer, a net removal of DOC occurred in the covered section, while in an adjace… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This translates into considerable mass retention ( Table 2) that is closely bracketed by values reported from field experiments (e.g. Kuserk et al 1984).…”
Section: Doc Processing By Streambed Biofilmssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This translates into considerable mass retention ( Table 2) that is closely bracketed by values reported from field experiments (e.g. Kuserk et al 1984).…”
Section: Doc Processing By Streambed Biofilmssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Early field experiments showed that benthic microbial communities can retain considerable amounts of DOC (e.g. Kuserk et al 1984, McDowell 1985 and bacterial uptake and growth efficiency depend on the DOC source (Kaplan & Bott 1983). Kaplan & Bott (1985) and McArthur et al (1985) provided the first evidence that stream bacteria become acclimated to given sources of DOC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creek, Canagagigue Creek and the Saugeen River were generally greater than those reported for streams of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (1-3 mg/l, Fisher & Likens, 1973;Johnson et al, 1981;McDowell, 1985), for streams of the Pennsylvania Piedmont (means usually < 5 mg/l, Kaplan et al, 1980;Kaplan & Bott, 1982;Bott et al, 1984;Kuserk et al, 1984) or for streams of the Marmot Basin, Alberta (2-2.5 mg/l, Wallis et al, 1981), but were comparable to DOC concentrations reported for other hardwater streams in Michigan (Augusta Ck, annual mean 4.4 (k 45%) mg/l, Wetzel & Manny, 1977) and southern Ontario (2.3 -15.5 mg/l, Lock et al, 1977). Our Waterloo County Streams (Salem and Canagagigue Ck) were probably the most affected by agriculture of all these streams and their high daytime mean DOC concentrations may be attributable in part to enrichment by livestock manure and chemical fertilizers.…”
Section: Mean Daytime Concentrations Of Doc In Salemmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…(1)) results in an increase in photosynthates like carbohydrates (byproducts of photosynthesis) (Parker et al, 2010;Westhorpe and Mitrovic, 2012) and labile DOC by the phototransformation of recalcitrant DOC into more available forms (Bushaw et al, 1996;Lindell et al, 1996;Westhorpe and Mitrovic, 2012). On the contrary, the consumption by heterotrophs like bacteria, is expected to be higher in the nighttime in the absence of photosynthesis, which causes the DOC to decrease overnight (Bertilsson and Jones, 2003;Kuserk et al, 1984;Nimick et al, 2011). Another hypothesis is that when bacteria are exposed to sunlight, their metabolism can decrease during the day (Lindell et al, 1996;Westhorpe and Mitrovic, 2012).…”
Section: Dissolved Organic Carbon (Doc)mentioning
confidence: 99%