2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ mechanical investigation of rammed earth: Calibration of minor destructive testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, using nondestructive techniques to determine the in-situ characteristics of RE walls is less reported, although several studies can be cited. Lombillo et al [26] used minordestructive techniques such as flat jack, hole-drilling, and mini-pressure meter. Bui et al [27] developed an analytical procedure to determine the Young's modulus of RE walls from the non-destructive vibrational measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using nondestructive techniques to determine the in-situ characteristics of RE walls is less reported, although several studies can be cited. Lombillo et al [26] used minordestructive techniques such as flat jack, hole-drilling, and mini-pressure meter. Bui et al [27] developed an analytical procedure to determine the Young's modulus of RE walls from the non-destructive vibrational measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this fact, in this case, the compressive strength was estimated following the suggestion of Lombillo et al 19,25 by fitting a logarithmic curve on the non-linear region of the envelope loading cycles (stress-strain relationship) and considering the maximum stress associated with a deformation of 3‰ as proposed in. 19,25 Test on rubble stone masonry walls A total of four tests were performed on walls made with rubble limestone with air lime mortar: one test on the back façade wall of the ''Pombalino'' building (P.1) and three tests on the side external wall of the ''Gaioleiro'' building (G.1, G.2, and G.3). The test setup (test P.1 as an example) and the relationship between the average stress in the masonry (σ m ) and the average vertical strain (ε V ) for both cycles of pressure are displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Double Flat-jack Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the Young's modulus was defined as the secant value to 1/3 of the masonry compressive strength E s(1/3 f c ) according to EN 1052-1. 19,25 Test on rubble stone masonry walls A total of four tests were performed on walls made with rubble limestone with air lime mortar: one test on the back façade wall of the ''Pombalino'' building (P.1) and three tests on the side external wall of the ''Gaioleiro'' building (G.1, G.2, and G.3). In fact, the load applied by the top flat-jack needs to be reacted and cannot be larger than the dead load on the wall.…”
Section: Double Flat-jack Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%