2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ methods to determine residual prestress forces in concrete bridges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Testing methods are in general required for estimating prestress losses, and include five typologies (Table 3): (1) static load testing to determine crack initiation or crack re-opening loads to obtain the available compressive stress in the bottom flange of a PC girder [23,28,54,55]. (2) Severing the prestressing tendon by cutting it into a representative exposed length after placing strain gauges on the tendon [23,56].…”
Section: Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Testing methods are in general required for estimating prestress losses, and include five typologies (Table 3): (1) static load testing to determine crack initiation or crack re-opening loads to obtain the available compressive stress in the bottom flange of a PC girder [23,28,54,55]. (2) Severing the prestressing tendon by cutting it into a representative exposed length after placing strain gauges on the tendon [23,56].…”
Section: Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Relating the tension in the tendon to a vertical deflection recorded when known weights are suspended from it on a representative exposed length [54,57]. (4) Determining the side pressure to close the induced crack in a small cylindrical hole drilled adjacent to the tendon in the bottom flange of a PC girder [55,58]. (5) Vibration testing to determine the natural frequencies and/or dynamic responses of a PC girder [59][60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter a failure test of the strengthened girders was carried out, followed by a failure test of the bridge deck slab adjacent to the third girder still in function. The residual pre-stress forces were evaluated based on destructive and non-destructive methods, Bagge et al (2014Bagge et al ( , 2017.…”
Section: Experimental Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has become a worldwide problem that midspan lag and box girder cracks are common in prestressed concrete (PSC) continuous box girder bridges [1,2]. The method of strengthening with a stay cable system (SCS) can fairly well solve this kind of problems, ensures the safety of the bridge structure, and extends the service life of the bridge; this method gradually gains the attention of the engineering community [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%