2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ monitoring of protein transfer into nanoscale channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions may also contribute to the structural change. [27] However, the content of β-sheet from HRP-COF-LZU1 is increased, whereas the content of β-sheet from HRP-RT-COF-1 and HRP-ACOF-1 is decreased, suggesting the HRP conformation in COF-LZU1 is more favorable. the enzyme experienced significant structural alteration upon immobilization within reticular framework, although this structural change is generally not stable in its free form, as evidenced by our previous research that the reticular frameworks could lock this fragile conformation and improve the enzyme stability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beyond hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions may also contribute to the structural change. [27] However, the content of β-sheet from HRP-COF-LZU1 is increased, whereas the content of β-sheet from HRP-RT-COF-1 and HRP-ACOF-1 is decreased, suggesting the HRP conformation in COF-LZU1 is more favorable. the enzyme experienced significant structural alteration upon immobilization within reticular framework, although this structural change is generally not stable in its free form, as evidenced by our previous research that the reticular frameworks could lock this fragile conformation and improve the enzyme stability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The HRP in different COFs undergoes a similar transition, which implies that a nonspecific hydrogen bond interaction between the enzyme and COF framework is present. Beyond hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions may also contribute to the structural change [27] . However, the content of β‐sheet from HRP‐COF‐LZU1 is increased, whereas the content of β‐sheet from HRP‐RT‐COF‐1 and HRP‐ACOF‐1 is decreased, suggesting the HRP conformation in COF‐LZU1 is more favorable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4F reveals the remarkable catalytic activity of CAT/HCPOS-1 with a rate of 6.0 μM•s -1 , approximately 67% of the activity of the free enzyme (8.9 μM•s -1 ), indicating that the enzyme structure is not significantly disrupted during the immobilization process. The hydrophilic nature of the surface plays a crucial role in maintaining the active conformation of enzymes [60,61] . In the case of HCPOS-1, numerous polar functional groups on the surface impart HCPOS-1 with a hydrophilic surface, as confirmed by water contact angle measurement [Supplementary Figure 18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17). 190 In the time-resolved EPR spectra, different loading profiles were observed among the different channels with different surface charges and hydrophobicity distributions, which depended on the different host–guest interactions, such as electrostatic interaction for a charged channel and hydrophobic interaction for a hydrophobic channel. Even in the same channel, the enzyme orientation changed with time due to the host preference toward each labelled site.…”
Section: Enzyme Conformation and Its Functional Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%