2018
DOI: 10.3390/app8122479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-Situ Nanoparticles: A New Strengthening Method for Metallic Structural Material

Abstract: Over the past several years, coherent interface strengthening was proposed and has since drawn much attention. Unfortunately, many fabrication techniques are restricted to very small size. Recently, a brand new method of in-situ nanoparticle strengthening was systematically investigated, which was proved to be an efficacious way to optimize microstructure and improve mechanical property by utilizing uniformly dispersed nanoparticles. In this review, we summarized recent related advances in investigated steels … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A dislocation with a Burgers vector of 1/2〈110〉 (marked by “⊥”) appeared close to the boundary instead of lying at the boundary. It was noted that the coherent interface between nanoparticles and matrix with low mismatch and little lattice distortion could effectively facilitate the release of stress concentrations, generating considerable plastic strain 15 . The high coherency of α–β interfaces and α–α intersections implied limited resistance for dislocation transferring.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dislocation with a Burgers vector of 1/2〈110〉 (marked by “⊥”) appeared close to the boundary instead of lying at the boundary. It was noted that the coherent interface between nanoparticles and matrix with low mismatch and little lattice distortion could effectively facilitate the release of stress concentrations, generating considerable plastic strain 15 . The high coherency of α–β interfaces and α–α intersections implied limited resistance for dislocation transferring.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ti6Al4V-TiC composites' hardness varied between 422HV and 459HV, compared with 420HV for plain Ti6Al4V in this study, and 391HV (Ali et al, 2017) and 386HV (Ali et al, 2018) in previous studies using the same parent Ti6Al4V alloy and SLM equipment. The presence of TiC particles can improve the strength of composite parts through the mechanisms of grain refinement, Orowan strengthening and increased dislocation density (AlMangour et al, 2017(AlMangour et al, , 2018Ferguson et al, 2014;Pan et al, 2018;Wei et al, 2017;Yu et al, 2019). It is also likely that some residual solid solution carbon dissolved within the parent b-matrix, which is then incorporated into the a 0 -matrix by the diffusionless martensitic transformation.…”
Section: Microstructure and Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dislocation with a Burgers vector of 1/2<110> (marked by "⊥") appeared close to the boundary instead of lying at the boundary. It was noted that the coherent interface between nanoparticles and matrix with low mismatch and little lattice distortion could effectively facilitate the release of stress concentrations, generating considerable plastic strain [15] . The high coherency of α-β interfaces and α-α intersections implied limited resistance for dislocation transferring.…”
Section: Microstructure Of Dual-phase Timo Alloymentioning
confidence: 99%