2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2005.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ observation of substitutional and interstitial Fe atoms in Si after GeV-implantation: An in-beam Mössbauer study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42 Extensive measurements in n-and p-type samples, where 57 Fe was introduced by several methods, were also carried out by Yoshida and his group. 13,26,43 Although their data for p-type Si seems to be in line with other reported data (δ = 0.8 mm/s), for n-type material a resonance at δ = 0.40 mm/s has been assigned to Fe 0 i . Since our calculations conflict with this assignment, we investigated several possible sources of error, including (i) increasing the BZ sampling grid to MP-4 3 , (ii) bringing the 3s state of Fe into the valence to be treated within the Kohn-Sham scheme, (iii) including an on-site correction to the exchange-correlation energy by means of the GGA+U +J approach as proposed by Liechtenstein et al 113 (with Hubbard and Hund parameters in the range U = 2-5 eV and J = 0-1 eV), and (iv) using the local density approximation to the electronic exchange-correlation interactions.…”
Section: B Interstitial Iron In Siliconsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…42 Extensive measurements in n-and p-type samples, where 57 Fe was introduced by several methods, were also carried out by Yoshida and his group. 13,26,43 Although their data for p-type Si seems to be in line with other reported data (δ = 0.8 mm/s), for n-type material a resonance at δ = 0.40 mm/s has been assigned to Fe 0 i . Since our calculations conflict with this assignment, we investigated several possible sources of error, including (i) increasing the BZ sampling grid to MP-4 3 , (ii) bringing the 3s state of Fe into the valence to be treated within the Kohn-Sham scheme, (iii) including an on-site correction to the exchange-correlation energy by means of the GGA+U +J approach as proposed by Liechtenstein et al 113 (with Hubbard and Hund parameters in the range U = 2-5 eV and J = 0-1 eV), and (iv) using the local density approximation to the electronic exchange-correlation interactions.…”
Section: B Interstitial Iron In Siliconsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Their isomer shifts do not change at all within experimental errors during all measurements. The isomer shifts of the singlet 1, 2 and 3 are −0.12 (3) mm/s, 0.33 (3) mm/s, 0.67 (8) mm/s, respectively, which are in good agreement with those of substitutional Fe s , interstitial Fe 0 i and Fe + i [4][5][6][7]. The third component of Fe + i appears to be too small to discuss precisely in the present experiment, although this component could be more clearly detected before in a simple absorber experiment on the same type of sample.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…We have developed a set-up for 57 Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy combined with an Instron-type tensile testing machine. Mössbauer spectroscopy appears to be an ideal tool to identify lattice sites and charge states of 57 Fe in Si [3][4][5][6], and also to determine the Fe diffusivity through a line broadening if the jump frequency stays within a range between 10 6 and 10 8 jumps/s. In the present paper, we report on an in-situ Mössbauer absorber experiment of a 57 Fe doped n-type Si wafer, on which external bending stress was applied at room temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron impurities in Si have been intensively investigated for more than 50 years by different experimental techniques [1] including 57 Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], because Fe impurities can be easily incorporated into the Si matrix during the processes, and even an extremely low Fe concentration of 10 11 /cm 3 can degrade seriously the electronic properties of silicon-based devices and solar cells. This is due to the deep levels formed in the Si band gap, producing strong trapping centres for the carriers in the devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interstitial Fe i is well known to form an acceptor level at 0.39 eV from the valence band edge, while substitutional Fe s is expected to form a donor level of 0.69 eV from the first principle calculation [10]. Although interstitial and substitutional Fe appeared as spectral components in 57 Fe Mössbauer experiments [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], the charge states could not be identified in terms of different isomer shifts of Mössbauer spectrum experimentally in comparison with the values calculated theoretically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%