“…Dust control merits one more mention here as well. ,,, Fortunately, once again all these issues can at least in principle be dealt with via the PEStep approach of A → B (rate constant k 1 ) that has been able to deal with the following, again at least in the case of Ir(0) n particle formation reactions: mass-transfer limitations, the effects of pH, of H 2 O, of acetone solvent impurities, of trace EtOAc as an impurity, of nanocluster stabilizer, , of precursor concentration, , of dust, , and other effects that cause “super-sensitive” kinetics. - Fifth, the use of multiple (ideally all), possible complimentary physical methods will help lead to greater mechanistic insights into (BaSO 4 ) n formation. These include rapid mixing, high-precision conductivity, , SAXS/WAXS studies like those done on (CdSe) n and other systems, ,, XANES, X-ray PDF analysis, nonlinear optical spectroscopy, SEM/TEM/STEM/HAADF-STEM, neutron-scattering, infrared spectroscopy, vertical scanning interferometry, atomic force microscopy, ,, and dynamic light scattering to monitor not only nucleation earlier and with greater sensitivity, but also monitor growth processes such as in Kügler et al’s important contribution. ,
- Sixth, better insights into, and understanding of, the role(s) of ion-pairing (triple ions and higher clusters, e.g., in more concentrated solutions near or above supersaturation) and PNCs , on especially nucleation are likely to prove of interest. A key here will be to determine if any spectroscopically observable species are on-path vs off-path to the final (BaSO 4 ) n , something that cannot be attained with kinetics under steady-state conditions but, instead, requires pre- or post-steady-state kinetics studies. ,
- Seventh, additional state-of-the-art computations ,− would be most welcome, especially those anchored to all available experimental benchmarks, calculations that ideally include explicit treatment of specific waters of hydration as well as the bulk dielectric constant of water as the so...
…”