2015
DOI: 10.1002/jps.24447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Perfusion Model in Rat Colon for Drug Absorption Studies: Comparison with Small Intestine and Caco-2 Cell Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the dog is well-known to have a colon that is much more permeable to drugs than that of human, presumably any reference value in human would result in a jejunal vs colonic ratio at least within the same order of magnitude as observed in dog [32]. Consequently, the plasma appearance of these two drugs suggests that the rat SPIP model is unable to accurately predict regional intestinal permeability of medium-to-low permeability drugs in human, which is also reported by others [33]. However, it should be emphasized that the rat SPIP model is still useful for evaluating a range of other biopharmaceutical, physiological, and biochemical processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Since the dog is well-known to have a colon that is much more permeable to drugs than that of human, presumably any reference value in human would result in a jejunal vs colonic ratio at least within the same order of magnitude as observed in dog [32]. Consequently, the plasma appearance of these two drugs suggests that the rat SPIP model is unable to accurately predict regional intestinal permeability of medium-to-low permeability drugs in human, which is also reported by others [33]. However, it should be emphasized that the rat SPIP model is still useful for evaluating a range of other biopharmaceutical, physiological, and biochemical processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In rats, the total mucus layer thickness (including the firmly and loosely adherent layers) are respectively 0.480 and 0.829mm at the end of the ileum and in the colon [1]. The colon radius in rats is 0.4cm [25]. Assuming that the rheologic and hydrodynamic parameters are the same in rats, a simple rescaling of our model outcome would give a maximal mucus thickness of 0.272, 0.688 and 0.384mm in the proximal, transverse and distal colon, which is comparable to the rat data.…”
Section: Mucus Layermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The modeling of the mass transfers through the boundaries is a key step since they account for the lumen-epithelium exchanges, which are central both in the fluid dynamics and in the metabolic activity through metabolite absorption and release. They influence the longitudinal speed, as it will be emphasized in the formula (25) describing the transit motion in Section 2.2. Furthermore, the mass transfers also include the dietary intake, and in particular the fiber intake which is the main source of nutrients for the microbiota.…”
Section: Bacterial Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both perfusion techniques have shown equally good correlations to literature values of the absorbed fraction of the oral dose (F abs ) in humans [32,33]. The closed-loop in situ perfusion technique based on Doluisio's method [34] has been widely applied for intestinal absorption of different drugs and in different regions of the intestine [35][36][37]. Earlier, the closed-loop intestinal perfusion technique has been applied to investigate the mechanisms governing absorption from drug suspensions [38] and drug-loaded microdevices [16] in the small intestine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier, the closed-loop intestinal perfusion technique has been applied to investigate the mechanisms governing absorption from drug suspensions [38] and drug-loaded microdevices [16] in the small intestine. The closed-loop perfusion technique has previously been validated to study colonic absorption [37], but has not yet been applied to study mucoadhesion and absorption simultaneously in this region of the GI tract.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%