1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00523.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Situ Repair of Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers and 6–4 Photoproducts in Human Skin Exposed to Solar Simulating Radiation

Abstract: DNA repair is crucial to the integrity of the human genome. The ultraviolet radiation portion of solar radiation is responsible for the rising incidence of skin cancer, one of the most common types of cancer in humans. We applied a recently developed 32P-postlabeling technique to measure the in situ DNA repair efficiency of solar-simulated radiation induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6-4 photoproducts in the skin of nine healthy volunteers with skin type II. Our results show about 6-fold interindividual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
78
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
9
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This normalization did not change the ranges or the relative SDs of the data, demonstrating that other factors are more important for determining interindividual differences in urinary excretion of T = T. There was no correlation between skin type or age and total amount of T = T. This was maybe not unexpected because only skin types II and III were represented, and the population was small in size and similar in age, making it difficult to detect possible differences. In studies of T = T levels in human skin in situ, similar or even larger interindividual differences were noted (14,17). The doses used in the latter studies were erythema-weighted and the observed interindividual variations could therefore not be explained by differences in skin types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This normalization did not change the ranges or the relative SDs of the data, demonstrating that other factors are more important for determining interindividual differences in urinary excretion of T = T. There was no correlation between skin type or age and total amount of T = T. This was maybe not unexpected because only skin types II and III were represented, and the population was small in size and similar in age, making it difficult to detect possible differences. In studies of T = T levels in human skin in situ, similar or even larger interindividual differences were noted (14,17). The doses used in the latter studies were erythema-weighted and the observed interindividual variations could therefore not be explained by differences in skin types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These works led to the conclusion that TϽϾC was the major lesion generated (38)(39)(40). However, it may be pointed out that the same approach failed to provide reproducible data concerning the formation of CPDs in skin exposed to simulated sunlight (36,37,(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because humans vary up to 10-fold in their individual DNA repair capacity of distinct cell types as shown (e.g., for blood lymphocytes) (Buschfort-Papewalis et al, 2002), skin fibroblasts (Bykov et al, 1999), or gut epithelium cells (Lees et al, 2006), such variations in the target cells of cisplatin neurotoxicity may account for the interindividual differences in latency and severity of PNP symptoms. Previous postmortem measurements of augmented tissue platinum content in patients with clinical signs of neuropathy further support this assumption (Gregg et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%