2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ response test of various borehole depths and heat injection rates at standing column well geothermal heat exchanger systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the highest error for the flowmeter taken from Table 4 of ±2.03%, the total uncertainty in the heat balance equation was computed as Total Error = (±0.0165) 2 + (±0.0203)ˆ2 ≈ 2.62%. Figure 6 shows the average temperature and the difference of inlet/outlet temperatures over time for alluvial deposit, gneiss, and granite rocks using a ground heat exchanger system with a borehole depth of 200 m using a closed loop borehole heat exchanger system [3,6,13,41,49,53]. The initial groundwater temperature from the three types of rock was approximately 15-16 • C, with an average temperature distribution of approximately 28-35 • C during the test period.…”
Section: Uncertainty Utilizing Mass Heat Balance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Using the highest error for the flowmeter taken from Table 4 of ±2.03%, the total uncertainty in the heat balance equation was computed as Total Error = (±0.0165) 2 + (±0.0203)ˆ2 ≈ 2.62%. Figure 6 shows the average temperature and the difference of inlet/outlet temperatures over time for alluvial deposit, gneiss, and granite rocks using a ground heat exchanger system with a borehole depth of 200 m using a closed loop borehole heat exchanger system [3,6,13,41,49,53]. The initial groundwater temperature from the three types of rock was approximately 15-16 • C, with an average temperature distribution of approximately 28-35 • C during the test period.…”
Section: Uncertainty Utilizing Mass Heat Balance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, the effect of groundwater flow on the effective thermal conductivity of underground heat exchangers will be studied. Figures 8 and 9 show the evaluation results of thermal performance by temperature for a ground heat exchanger with the return pipe positioned as shown in Figure 5b, using an SCW underground heat exchanger with a borehole depth of 400 m, as shown in References [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. This study analyzed the characteristics of this in accordance with the effective thermal conductivity and thermal resistance as a study on the heat transfer characteristics according to a position above the submerged pump [52,56,57,60].…”
Section: Uncertainty Utilizing Mass Heat Balance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations