1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(97)00010-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ SEM observations of the contrasting effects of an overload on small fatigue crack growth at two different load ratios in 2024-T351 aluminium alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recent in situ SEM observations by Halliday et al 16 . essentially confirm the observations of Ref.…”
Section: Simulation Proceduressupporting
confidence: 84%
“…More recent in situ SEM observations by Halliday et al 16 . essentially confirm the observations of Ref.…”
Section: Simulation Proceduressupporting
confidence: 84%
“…On the other hand, temporary arrest following an overload has been observed for an apparently sharp crack tip by [57]. It also has been observed that both crack growth acceleration under spike underloads and crack growth retardation under spike overloads are accompanied by crack tip blunting [58,59]; hence the contribution of crack blunting to immediate retardation is not clear, rather than causing non-closure of the crack tip upon application of overload, leading to a brief increase in fatigue crack growth rates just after the application of overload [9,19,44,[60][61][62].…”
Section: Crack Tip Bluntingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained from these analyses can be validated by identifying the acceleration effect in compress stress spectra of other experiments. [4][5][6][7][9][10][11]68 The reason why there is a difference in the results given by the Forman and NASGROW equations is that the Forman equation calculates crack propagation lengths by LEFM procedures and neglects the load sequence effect for the threshold SIF range ( K th ) and retardation effect. In contrast, the NASGRO equation considers the stress level effect through the K th concept.…”
Section: Analysis Of Multiple Cracks For Compressive Stress Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 It is well recognized that load bearing structural components rarely experience loading amplitudes that remain constant during the length of the service. Halliday et al 6 found that for the aluminium alloy 2024-T351 tensile overload does not have any effect on fatigue crack growth rate at R = -1, but has a significant retardation effect at R = 0.05. A major influencing parameter to be considered is load history, which is usually variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation