1989
DOI: 10.1021/ma00194a055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ sequential polyurethane poly(methyl methacrylate) interpenetrating polymer networks: structure and elasticity of polyurethane networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, IPNs technology was proven an excellent polymer modification method for stable integration of two polymer networks with different properties or different functions by physical entanglements . Due to the strong phase separation liability between the hydrophobic polymer networks and the hydrophilic polymer networks, the hydrophobicity or the hydrophilicity of the two polymer networks composed of the IPNs is similar at present, at least not opposite, while few reports are presented for both hydrophobic and hydrophilic IPNs in the literature for the reason that the hydrophobic–hydrophilic IPNs cannot be directly synthesized by synchronous or sequential suspension polymerization . We proposed that the phase separation liability will not be very serious as one of the hydrophobic polymer networks is transformed to the hydrophilic polymer networks by a chemical reaction after preparation of the hydrophobic–hydrophobic IPNs, and the hydrophobic–hydrophilic IPNs will be synthesized accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, IPNs technology was proven an excellent polymer modification method for stable integration of two polymer networks with different properties or different functions by physical entanglements . Due to the strong phase separation liability between the hydrophobic polymer networks and the hydrophilic polymer networks, the hydrophobicity or the hydrophilicity of the two polymer networks composed of the IPNs is similar at present, at least not opposite, while few reports are presented for both hydrophobic and hydrophilic IPNs in the literature for the reason that the hydrophobic–hydrophilic IPNs cannot be directly synthesized by synchronous or sequential suspension polymerization . We proposed that the phase separation liability will not be very serious as one of the hydrophobic polymer networks is transformed to the hydrophilic polymer networks by a chemical reaction after preparation of the hydrophobic–hydrophobic IPNs, and the hydrophobic–hydrophilic IPNs will be synthesized accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our interest in that particular system comes from the fact that it takes part in the reactive medium when forming interpenetrating polymer networks based on polyurethanes 30 and vinyl polymers by a one shot process. 31 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical procedure is as follows. In a reaction flask equipped with nitrogen inlet and a magnetic stirrer and placed in a water bath, 1 mol macrodiol is mixed with 1.07 mol pluriisocyanate ( k = [NCO]/[OH] = 1.07) 33 and dissolved in ethyl acetate to form a 34 wt % homogeneous solution. When appropriate, calculated amounts of AIBN and TBPC were added to the solution under stirring.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%