2013
DOI: 10.1002/ggge.20051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ stress and pore pressure in the Kumano Forearc Basin, offshore SW Honshu from downhole measurements during riser drilling

Abstract: [1] In situ stress and pore pressure are key parameters governing rock deformation, yet direct measurements of these quantities are rare. During Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP) Expedition #319, we drilled through a forearc basin at the Nankai subduction zone and into the underlying accretionary prism. We used the Modular Formation Dynamics Tester tool (MDT) for the first time in IODP to measure in situ minimum stress, pore pressure, and permeability at 11 depths between 729.9 and 1533.9 mbsf. Leak-off… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(152 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interpretation is broadly consistent with observations of normal faults in the Kumano basin (Sacks et al 2013) and with major thrust splay faults within the prism (Moore et al 2009). However, the LOTs show that at least to ~2000 mbsf, S hmin is the least principal stress (i.e., S hmin is less than S v ), limiting stresses to a normal or strike-slip regime in this depth range both at Site C0002 (Strasser et al 2014;Tobin et al 2015) and at Site C0009 located ~20-km landward (Ito et al 2013;Saffer et al 2013). The inconsistency between our result and the imaging of thrust faults in the accretionary wedge could indicate that these structures are no longer active (Boston et al 2016), that S Hmax and S hmin increase with depth to become the maximum and intermediate principal stresses, or that the stress regime changes through the earthquake cycle and will build toward a thrust regime as strain accumulates during the interseismic period (e.g., Wang and Hu 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This interpretation is broadly consistent with observations of normal faults in the Kumano basin (Sacks et al 2013) and with major thrust splay faults within the prism (Moore et al 2009). However, the LOTs show that at least to ~2000 mbsf, S hmin is the least principal stress (i.e., S hmin is less than S v ), limiting stresses to a normal or strike-slip regime in this depth range both at Site C0002 (Strasser et al 2014;Tobin et al 2015) and at Site C0009 located ~20-km landward (Ito et al 2013;Saffer et al 2013). The inconsistency between our result and the imaging of thrust faults in the accretionary wedge could indicate that these structures are no longer active (Boston et al 2016), that S Hmax and S hmin increase with depth to become the maximum and intermediate principal stresses, or that the stress regime changes through the earthquake cycle and will build toward a thrust regime as strain accumulates during the interseismic period (e.g., Wang and Hu 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define the overburden stress (S v ) by integrating density data obtained from core samples Strasser et al 2014). We assume that formation pore pressure (P p ) is hydrostatic based on sedimentation models for the Kumano basin, consolidation tests on core samples, and direct measurements conducted during drilling at nearby IODP Site C0009 (Guo et al 2013;Saffer et al 2013). Values of annular pressure (APRS) in both holes were recorded continuously during drilling (Table 1) Strasser et al 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2; Lin et al, 2010b;Saffer et al, 2013;Wu et al, 2013). Estimates of stress magnitude from the width of borehole breakouts at Site C0002 suggested a similar pattern, i.e.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The second technique, a "two dual-packer hydraulic fracture test" was conducted using Modular Dynamic Tester (MDT) tool Saffer et al, 2013;Haimson and Cornet, 2003), and yielded two additional measurements of in situ minimum principal stress magnitude: one at ~877 mbsf and a less reliable determination at ~1534 mbsf.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum, Intermediate, and Minimum strains, and Mean principal strain) are calculated from anelastic strain raw data in nine directions, (d) Stereo projections (lower hemisphere) of orientations of three-dimensional principal stresses, which are the same as those of the principal anelastic strains from ASR measurements with respect to the true north coordinate system (Byrne et al, 2009) . et al, 2009;Lin et al, 2010;Chang et al, 2010;Song et al, 2011;Moore et al, 2011;Tsuji et al, 2011;Wu et al, 2012Wu et al, , 2013Wu et al, , 2015Lewis et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2013;Yamamoto et al, 2013;Kinoshita and Tobin, 2013;Ito et al, 2013;Saffer et al, 2013;Conin et al, 2014;Yamada and Shibanuma, 2015) Tanikawa et al, 2013) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%