1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf00764866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ study of reduction of copper catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction process follows a sigmoidal curve of reduction rate versus reduction degree [157][158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165]. This could be explained by an induction phenomenon, by difficulties in nucleation [165,166] or by autocatalysis due to the Cu crystallites formed [167].…”
Section: Other Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reduction process follows a sigmoidal curve of reduction rate versus reduction degree [157][158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165]. This could be explained by an induction phenomenon, by difficulties in nucleation [165,166] or by autocatalysis due to the Cu crystallites formed [167].…”
Section: Other Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that reduction of CuO in a binary catalyst is retarded compared with pure CuO [62,73,157,162,164,168,169], whereas it is accelerated in ternary catalysts [169]. CO reduces CuO faster than H 2 , especially in the final stages of the reduction where it is believed that the presence of hydroxyl groups on the surface of the catalyst inhibits the reduction by H 2 [167,170].…”
Section: Other Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The choice of CO as a probe molecule for Cu ions is implied from the existence of a characteristic carbonyl frequency shift, which depends strictly on the copper coordination environment, as well as the oxidation state [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. In the case of Cu 2+ cations, the CO-IR analysis is insufficient, thus complementary techniques such as Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) [ 20 , 21 , 22 ] and temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) [ 20 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ], as well as IR studies of NO sorption, are needed to receive a detailed characterization of the oxidation state and properties of Cu in zeolites under various red-ox conditions, e.g., [ 27 , 28 , 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peaks at 2q ¼ 13.0 , 24.1 , 27.9 , 34.2 , 38.4 , 41.9 , 50.1 are assigned to aurichalcite phase ((Cu, Zn) 5 (CO 3 ) 2 (OH) 6 ); the peaks at 2q ¼ 18.9 , 31.7 , 32.6 , 35.4 , 42.2 , 47.6 , 58.3 , 62.8 are ascribed to malachite phase (Cu 2 CO 3 (OH) 2 ); the peaks at 2q ¼ 14.7 , 17.3 , 29.6 , 43.9 , 48.6 belong to rosasite phase ((Cu, Zn) 2 CO 3 (OH) 2 ). [22][23][24][25] From Fig. 5 we can see that the peak at 2q ¼ 13.0 is the strongest one, which can be ascribed to aurichalcite; the peaks at 2q ¼ 17.3 and 31.7 are strong peaks, which are specic to rosasite and malachite, respectively.…”
Section: Xrd Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%