2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2013.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ surface wettability parameters of submerged in brackish water surfaces derived from captive bubble contact angle studies as indicators of surface condition level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contact angle hysteresis (CAH) measurements were performed with the captive bubble method described in detail elsewhere [56]. It should be noted that the measurement of dynamic contact angles is rate-dependent at high capillary numbers.…”
Section: Contact Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact angle hysteresis (CAH) measurements were performed with the captive bubble method described in detail elsewhere [56]. It should be noted that the measurement of dynamic contact angles is rate-dependent at high capillary numbers.…”
Section: Contact Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methods used in biofilm formation studies, for a review see (Azeredo et al, 2017). The contact angle (CA) captive bubble technique (Pogorzelski et al, 2013 adapted here allows the outermost biofilm surface wettability evolution to be monitored quasi-continuously and in-situ at subsequent stages of the biofilm formation starting from the molecular adsorption phase (second-minute time scale) to the final mature stage of the marine biofilm cycle. Geometric, structural and biological, commonly evaluated biofilm characteristics like: biovolume, coverage fraction, area to volume ratio, spatial heterogeneity, number of species, mean thickness, roughness, fractal dimension in 2D etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a reference, the trophic state of water body was determined from chemical analyses according to the following parameters: pH, dissolved O 2 , phosphate, nitrite, nitrate, ammonium concentrations, and further correlated to the determined biofilm characterizing parameters by means of Spearman's rank correlation procedure. Biofilm adhesive surface properties (surface free energy, work of adhesion) were obtained with the contact angle hysteresis (CAH) approach using an automatic captive bubble solid surface wettability sensor assigned for in-situ, on-line, and quasi-continuous measurements of permanently submerged samples (Pogorzelski et al, 2013;Pogorzelski and Szczepanska, 2014). From confocal reflection microscopy (COCRM) data, characteristic biofilm structural signatures such as biovolume, substratum coverage fraction, area to volume ratio, spatial heterogeneity, mean thickness, and roughness) were determined at different stages of microbial colony development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 3, there are many measurement methods that have been developed for particles: sessile drop method, [31][32][33][34][35][36][37] captive bubble technique, [38][39][40] Wilhelmy plate, 41) capillary rise method, 42,43) and some other new measurements, [44][45][46][47] all of the above are briefly described below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%