“…The optimal performance of β-Zn 4 Sb 3 is in the temperature range 473–673 K, − and this temperature range covers a lot of waste heat generated, for example, in the transportation and industrial sectors. , The performance of thermoelectric materials depends on different physical properties, which are concisely summarized in the thermoelectric figure of merit zT = S 2 T /ρκ, where S is the Seebeck coefficient, ρ is the electrical resistivity, T is the absolute temperature, and κ is the thermal conductivity, where the latter can be separated into contributions from the charge carriers and from the lattice . β-Zn 4 Sb 3 has an excellent zT mainly due to its low thermal conductivity, which can be ascribed to the scattering of phonons by the interstitial Zn atoms in the structure, resulting in a small lattice contribution. − A standing challenge with deploying Zn 4 Sb 3 in applications is the decomposition into ZnSb, Sb, Zn, and at times, ZnO, when exposed to the expected temperatures and thermal gradients used in applications. ,, This has led to a range of studies exploring ways to understand and combat this decomposition. ,− One of these studies investigated the effect of including TiO 2 or ZnO nanocomposites in the β-Zn 4 Sb 3 matrix, and significant improvements were observed in the thermal stability of powders containing TiO 2 nanoparticles, where 98 wt % of β-Zn 4 Sb 3 was intact after heating to 625 K in air compared with ∼30 wt % for pure β-Zn 4 Sb 3 . , The choice of TiO 2 nanoparticles in the present study is based on these results and their easy, cheap, and scalable synthesis with well-controlled size distribution …”