3rd Electronics System Integration Technology Conference ESTC 2010
DOI: 10.1109/estc.2010.5642875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ test structures for ultra low leak detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main disadvantage of a majority of the methods included in the industrial standards is their destructivity, which limits their use only to the statistical approach. Many authors propose alternative solutions for the methods used in the industry [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. It is possible to divide those methods into two main groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main disadvantage of a majority of the methods included in the industrial standards is their destructivity, which limits their use only to the statistical approach. Many authors propose alternative solutions for the methods used in the industry [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. It is possible to divide those methods into two main groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first group of methods uses different types of spectroscopy techniques: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy [6][7][8], Raman spectroscopy [8], and near-infrared spectroscopy [9]. The second group of methods described in [10][11][12][13] uses different piezoelectric, resistive, or capacitive internal structures of the component which monitor the changes of the internal pressure or the humidity increase inside of the package. The thermoacoustic test method presented in this article may be considered as an another example of a non-destructive alternative for destructive industrial hermeticity tests, especially for destructive gross leak detection methods such as a fluorocarbon bubble test or dye penetrant liquid test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%