2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2104.03045
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-situ Tuning of the Electric Dipole Strength of a Double Dot Charge Qubit: Charge Noise Protection and Ultra Strong Coupling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the interaction potential V ee is device-specific and cannot be altered in situ. Given a suitable gate pattern, the interaction matrix elements V ij , the local energy offsets ε i and nearest-neighbour hopping t ij may in principle still be tuned independently from one another [33]. For simplicity, we fix t and V 0 in our numerical simulation and treat them as constant for all distances R. Despite the fact that, in this way, we do not optimize the scaling parameter η for each R separately, we obtain a molecular binding curve with a pronounced minimum as shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the interaction potential V ee is device-specific and cannot be altered in situ. Given a suitable gate pattern, the interaction matrix elements V ij , the local energy offsets ε i and nearest-neighbour hopping t ij may in principle still be tuned independently from one another [33]. For simplicity, we fix t and V 0 in our numerical simulation and treat them as constant for all distances R. Despite the fact that, in this way, we do not optimize the scaling parameter η for each R separately, we obtain a molecular binding curve with a pronounced minimum as shown in Fig.…”
Section: B Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21) . 35 Furthermore, the frequency detuning ω off ( ) depends strongly on the antisymmetric Zeemann term δω z , because the leading order -dependent term of both the Bloch-Siegert shift and the qubit splitting is proportional to δω z . Therefore, the damping rate increases significantly, when the g-factors are different in the quantum dots.…”
Section: Charge Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In applications involving semiconductor qubits, the quality factors of high-impedance resonators are typically limited to ∼ 10 3 due to gate leakage [15,16]. Despite these relatively low quality factors, high-impedance resonators have realized important breakthroughs such as coherent coupling between a single photon and a single charge qubit [17,18], coherent spin-photon coupling [19][20][21][22][23] and distant resonant charge-to-charge [24] and spin-to-spin [25] coupling as well as rapid-gate based spin readout [26] and the demonstration of ultrastrong charge-photon coupling [27]. Impressively, the implemen-tation of high-impedance resonators with quality factors of ∼ 10 3 has enabled distant virtual-photon mediated charge-to-charge [24] and spin-to-spin [28] coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%