2000
DOI: 10.2138/am-2000-0120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In situ X-ray diffraction investigation of lawsonite and zoisite at high pressures and temperatures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7), the bulk modulus obtained here decreases monotonically with increasing temperature, at least up to 973 K. As the comparison with the previous results, we have also fitted our high temperature data by using only first order temperature derivative of bulk modulus, and yields V 0 = 674.2(3) Å 3 , K 0 = 126.9(15) GPa, ∂K T,0 /∂T = −0.019(5) GPa K −1 , and α = 2.7(3) × 10 −5 K −1 (see Table 2). The fitted temperature derivative of bulk modulus is consistent or comparable with the previous ones (Grevel et al, 2000;Schilling et al, 2003), which may imply that the second order dependence of bulk modulus on temperature is more precise in describing the equation of state of lawsonite, according to the present results. Chinnery et al (2000) and Grevel et al (2000) have calculated and discussed the reaction positions of lawsonite using their results.…”
Section: High Temperature Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…7), the bulk modulus obtained here decreases monotonically with increasing temperature, at least up to 973 K. As the comparison with the previous results, we have also fitted our high temperature data by using only first order temperature derivative of bulk modulus, and yields V 0 = 674.2(3) Å 3 , K 0 = 126.9(15) GPa, ∂K T,0 /∂T = −0.019(5) GPa K −1 , and α = 2.7(3) × 10 −5 K −1 (see Table 2). The fitted temperature derivative of bulk modulus is consistent or comparable with the previous ones (Grevel et al, 2000;Schilling et al, 2003), which may imply that the second order dependence of bulk modulus on temperature is more precise in describing the equation of state of lawsonite, according to the present results. Chinnery et al (2000) and Grevel et al (2000) have calculated and discussed the reaction positions of lawsonite using their results.…”
Section: High Temperature Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The fitted temperature derivative of bulk modulus is consistent or comparable with the previous ones (Grevel et al, 2000;Schilling et al, 2003), which may imply that the second order dependence of bulk modulus on temperature is more precise in describing the equation of state of lawsonite, according to the present results. Chinnery et al (2000) and Grevel et al (2000) have calculated and discussed the reaction positions of lawsonite using their results. According to their discussions, the thermoelastic parameters of lawsonite obtained here are reasonable.…”
Section: High Temperature Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite this limitation, a few quantitative structural studies by means of EDXD on synchrotron sources have been carried out (Glazer et al, 1978;Buras et al, 1979;Yamanaka & Ogata, 1991). The method has gained increasing popularity as a tool to monitor the change of lattice parameters with pressure (P) and/or temperature (T) in order to derive the corresponding equation of state (see for example Grevel et al, 2000) or to detect the occurrence of phase transformations (Zhang & Guyot, 1999). Both whole-pattern powder decomposition (Morishima et al, 1999) and Rietveld re®nement (Frost & Fei, 1999) have been carried out on EDXD data, but apparently to determine cell parameters only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%