In-store interactive advertising screens: the effect of interactivity on impulse buying explained by self-agency

Abstract

PurposePhysical stores are increasingly dependent on impulse visits and the impulse purchases of passers-by. Interactive advertising screens in store windows could help retailers increase impulse-visit urges and impulse-buying urges. However, the effects of interactive screens in physical surroundings have not been studied before. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effect of interactive screens on impulse urges and gain insight into the underlying mechanism that explains the possible effect.Design/methodology/approachAn interactive screen was placed in a store window. Using three field experiments, we studied the effect of interactivity-level (high vs low) on the impulse-visit and impulse-buying urges of passers-by, and the mediating role of self-agency in these effects.FindingsHighly interactive (compared to less interactive) advertising screens in store windows positively affect impulse-visit and impulse-buying urges through self-agency. Retailers can therefore use interactive advertising screens to increase the number of impulse purchases if feelings of self-agency are activated.Originality/valueThis is the first study to examine the extent to which interactive screens in a store window enhance the impulse-visit and impulse-buying urges of passers-by and the mediating factor of these effects. By conducting three field experiments, we achieved a high external validity and managed to share very reliable results owing to the replication of the findings.

The Impacts of Mobile Wallet App Characteristics on Online Impulse Buying: A Moderated Mediation Model

“…The findings demonstrate that perceived interactivity significantly predicts impulse buying. The finding concords with the previous research indicating that perceived interactivity has an indirect effect [79] and a direct effect [80] on impulse buying. However, the relationship between these two variables is negatively related.…”

A good reason to buy: Justification drives the effect of advertising frames on impulsive socially responsible buying

“…In such cases, participants are often afterwards asked if the purchase was done impulsively (e.g., Mohan et al, 2013). This may lead to false answers, as it is likely that people defend their impulsively made choices by convincing themselves (and others) that the purchase was planned (see Moes et al, 2021). In Experiment 2, which will be a vignette‐based experiment, we are able to measure actual impulse behavior without encountering this problem (see “Experiment 2,” “Measurements”).…”

“…Impulse buying urge was measured with three items (e.g., "I feel a strong urge to buy the cookies," explained variance = 88.38%, Cronbach's α = 0.93, M = 3.6, SD = 1.4) on a 7-point Likert scale based on the measurement used by Sultan et al (2012); see also Moes et al (2021).…”

An empirical study on impulse consumption intention of livestreaming e-commerce: The mediating effect of flow experience and the moderating effect of time pressure

“…Finally, Lee and Eastin (2021) Research shows that a more flexible interactive framework in social media will help users form a closer relationship with brand marketing communication organizations and brand customers’ decision makers, thus increasing impulsive consumption intention. Content information in highly interactive (and less interactive) electronic screens has a positive impact on impulsive access and impulsive consumption through self-agency ( Moes et al, 2022 ). The effective interaction between information sources and users in the live stream room may also promote users’ impulsive consumption intention.…”