2012 IEEE International Test Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1109/test.2012.6401541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-system constrained-random stimuli generation for post-silicon validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2(d). These maskingbased methods eliminate the need for solving system equations and continuously reseeding LFSR with a set of seeds, as done in prior works [14], [15]. Also, as shown in this paper, they reduce the amount of data that is stored on-chip for programmable CRSG, because one cube can imply a large number of valid stimuli that satisfy the user-defined functional constraints without the need for a significant investment in onchip logic or memory resources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2(d). These maskingbased methods eliminate the need for solving system equations and continuously reseeding LFSR with a set of seeds, as done in prior works [14], [15]. Also, as shown in this paper, they reduce the amount of data that is stored on-chip for programmable CRSG, because one cube can imply a large number of valid stimuli that satisfy the user-defined functional constraints without the need for a significant investment in onchip logic or memory resources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…4, it is not obvious how to port such features to hardware. Even if a mechanism is provided to alter the pseudorandom values produced by the LFSR in order to meet logic constraints, as it is the case for [14] [15] it is also necessary that the sequential constraints can be applied at a rate as fast as during pre-silicon verification. And when using sequential constraints is of key importance for post-silicon validation environments, it is critical that the hardware generator can handle constraint switching on a clock cycle basis.…”
Section: B Sequential Constraints Over Consecutive Clock Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently [4] has shown how the concepts for pseudorandom sequence generation, ubiquitous in built-in self-test (BIST) for VLSI circuits, can be adapted to apply constrained-random patterns that are consistent with the constraints described in a pre-silicon environment. The basic idea is to translate the pre-silicon constraints into a representation where constrainedrandom sequences can be mapped onto the output space generated by compact finite state machines, such as linear-feedback shift registers (LFSRs).…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%