2011
DOI: 10.1353/ajp.2011.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In the Footprints of Aeschylus: Recognition, Allusion, and Metapoetics in Euripides

Abstract: It is well known that Euripides responds to Aeschylus in several of his plays, most notably in Electra . In this article I suggest a new reading of the recognition scene in Euripides' Electra , comparing also the recognition sequence in Iphigenia among the Taurians , which alludes to the same Aeschylean model. I argue that through their allusions to Aeschylus, both scenes can be read as metapoetic reflections on the constraints and conventions of dramatic composition. The issue, therefore, is not one of critic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fraenkel 1950, 815-26;Bain 1977;Basta Donzelli 1980;West 1980;and Kovacs 1989 have objected to Electra 518-44, with some arguing that it is an interpolation, either on the aesthetic grounds that such parody does not belong in tragedy or on perceived logical or linguistic inconsistencies within the play. Lloyd-Jones 1961;Bond 1974;Davies 1998;Gallagher 2003;and Torrance 2011 have made the case that the scene forges thematic and linguistic connections with the rest of the play and, therefore, should not be excised. In particular, Davies 1998, 390-91, andGallagher 2003, 402, n. 8, have refuted the objections of Kovacs 1989, who questions how the scene fits with its immediate surroundings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fraenkel 1950, 815-26;Bain 1977;Basta Donzelli 1980;West 1980;and Kovacs 1989 have objected to Electra 518-44, with some arguing that it is an interpolation, either on the aesthetic grounds that such parody does not belong in tragedy or on perceived logical or linguistic inconsistencies within the play. Lloyd-Jones 1961;Bond 1974;Davies 1998;Gallagher 2003;and Torrance 2011 have made the case that the scene forges thematic and linguistic connections with the rest of the play and, therefore, should not be excised. In particular, Davies 1998, 390-91, andGallagher 2003, 402, n. 8, have refuted the objections of Kovacs 1989, who questions how the scene fits with its immediate surroundings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 74. As Gowers (1993), 103, has shown, Plautus' re-enactment of Medea's rejuvenation of Aeson in Pseudolus (868-72) has metapoetic implications too, suggesting the Roman playwright's ‘self-deprecating view of his restoration of Greek drama’. On the representation of interpoetic rivalry as an opposition of liquids, see the case of Euripides vs Aeschylus in Euripides' Electra discussed by Torrance (2011), 185. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%