2013
DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In the hour of Sugammadex

Abstract: Sugammadex is a modified gamma-cyclodextrin which is showing favorable outcomes regarding reversal of neuromuscular blockade, especially by rocuronium. It is designed to encapsulate rocuronium and being considered a new class of drugs as selective relaxant binding agents. It has given countless benefits to the patients at risk of incomplete or delayed recovery after neuromuscular block and has renown for another milestone in anesthesia practice. Recurrence of neuromuscular block has not been reported to be ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, sugammadex consistently showed strong protective effects in various subgroups. Sugammadex immediately induces a solid and persistent reversal from neuromuscular blockade by encapsulating rocuronium or vecuronium molecules [35]. Recent studies have consistently reported that sugammadex prevents PPCs by avoiding the residual neuromuscular blockade, which is known to be common with conventional nondepolarizing agents [10,11,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, sugammadex consistently showed strong protective effects in various subgroups. Sugammadex immediately induces a solid and persistent reversal from neuromuscular blockade by encapsulating rocuronium or vecuronium molecules [35]. Recent studies have consistently reported that sugammadex prevents PPCs by avoiding the residual neuromuscular blockade, which is known to be common with conventional nondepolarizing agents [10,11,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of the 25 records, 14 failed to meet the inclusion criteria. Four were in Japanese [14][15][16][17]; three were not primary investigations [18][19][20]; in the six from the MHRA, sufficient detail of the hypersensitivity reaction could not be disclosed owing to concerns over patient confidentiality; and one included a probable alternative explanation for the reaction [21]. We identified a total of 11 studies to be included in the qualitative analysis, including: two case series of three patients each [22,23]; six case reports [24][25][26][27][28][29]; an abstract [30]; and two clinical trials [7,31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Della Rocca et al 4 have warned that, in the context of residual neuromuscular block-related incidents, hospitals are increasingly likely to face questions or complaints if sugammadex was unavailable or not used. Nevertheless, even after ten review articles [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] in the last 18 months, anaesthetists still search to find definite answers to basic questions about the optimal use of sugammadex and its place in their practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%