‘In the Meantime’: Ordinary Life in Continuous Medical Testing for Lung Cancer

Abstract

Based on ethnographic fieldwork among Danes undergoing CT scans as part of follow-up testing for potential lung cancer, we explore how access to technologies generates diagnostic uncertainty and trends of continuous testing. Our research is set in the context of a welfare state that has cultivated forms of government whose public health branches focus on early diagnosis and cancer control. Many studies on biotechnologies emphasise subject-making and power relations. Inspired by the work of Veena Das, we adopt an approach that focuses on the entanglement of diagnostic investigations with everyday life. We argue that being followed establishes a mode of being which we call ‘in the meantime’. Life in the meantime is equally characterised by a dramatic mode of being—that is, waiting for death—and an ambiguous mode of being: feeling quite well. As with any life crisis, it involves some sense of agency. We show in this paper how life in the meantime informs an ordinary ethics that encourages three ethical concerns in everyday life: firstly, how to inhabit life in the meantime? Secondly, what good is the testing for? And finally, what is a good death?

Luckily—I am not the worrying kind: Experiences of patients in the Danish cancer patient pathway for non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer

“…A study by Frumer and colleagues emphasised that: 'It is in relation to the contours of everyday life that the meanings of diagnostics are moulded' (Frumer et al, 2021). Frumer's study explored the case of Jan and Bente, and how they experienced continuous testing as part of a control programme for lung cancer (Frumer et al, 2021). Testing had become part of their ordinary, entangling everyday life.…”

“…This unavoidable context of cancer was not transferred into a direct statement of worry about cancer, but we suggest that worries are inherent in the affective state of anticipation which was expressed in several ways and became especially visible in the pathway’s entanglement with everyday life. A study by Frumer and colleagues emphasised that: ‘It is in relation to the contours of everyday life that the meanings of diagnostics are moulded’ (Frumer et al, 2021). Frumer’s study explored the case of Jan and Bente, and how they experienced continuous testing as part of a control programme for lung cancer (Frumer et al, 2021).…”

“…and, when is something ‘something’? (Brandner et al, 2014; Frumer et al, 2021; Macdonald et al, 2019; Merrild et al, 2017; Offersen et al, 2016). The studies all emphasise the importance of context and socially dependent interpretations of bodily sensations.…”

Detecting value(s): Digital biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease and the valuation of new diagnostic technologies

“…As the case of AD illustrates, diagnostic processes and categories are increasingly organised around practices of anticipatory surveillance and new ‘nuances of disease’—including sub‐clinical manifestations, mild, prodromal and ‘at risk’ states (Armstrong, 1995; Aronowitz, 2009; Frumer et al., 2021; Gillespie, 2015; Jutel & Nettleton, 2011; Salter et al., 2011; Timmermans & Buchbinder, 2010). While not new (cf.…”

​​Irritating Bowels​: Attention and Everyday Management of Gut Trouble in Denmark

“…example, the welfare state offers free (tax-funded) health services as well as social security benefits when people become ill or unemployed (Wiking 2014). Most people in Denmark place high levels of trust in welfare institutions such as the healthcare system (Frumer et al 2021). More than providing services to accommodate needs, the welfare state enables citizens to 'fare well' through life (Langer and Højlund 2011).…”