In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: economic insecurity and coping strategies of Italian households

Abstract

PurposeThis paper offers a contribution to the authors’ understanding of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on living conditions of Italian households. A large part of the research, analysis, comments focused on the relation between the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and income of the Italian households does not capture the extent of the current changes. The focus on the highly differentiated impacts of the pandemic on three core dimensions of social integration (the sphere of work, that of welfare and that of the family) could help the authors to grasp the current transformations.Design/methodology/approachThe research draws on Castel's distinction between three “zones” of post-Fordist employment societies with the aim to identify the processes and the conditions that carry individuals from one “zones” to the other. Theoretical considerations are supported by the findings of several qualitative and quantitative research carried out during the pandemic mainly by government agencies and international organizations as OECD and WHO. The analysis of healthcare expenditure, labour market and economic conditions of households is based on data of system of health accounts – SHA and from consumer studies undertaken by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT). The data on the financial situation and expectations of households during the crisis used in the article were drawn from special surveys carried out by the Bank of Italy.FindingsWhat the authors observe in Italian society is not a collapse of the three pillars of social and system integration of contemporary societies: work, family and welfare. The COVID-19 pandemic has reversed two social and institutional trends, that in last two decades had damaged these spheres of life and that seemed relentless. First, what has been reversed are: the progressive privatization of welfare and the enhancement of the politics of retrenchment; second, values and styles of life, radical processes of individualization, that undermined mutual relations of support and care, and households' ability to cope with old and new risks. At the same time, the pandemic is radicalizing the long-lasting tendency towards job insecurity, a high incidence of low-paid workers and a high proportion of undeclared work. The highly differentiated impacts of the pandemic on these three spheres of life are creating a wider plurality of living conditions and risks.Social implicationsThe findings suggest that what the authors need is to reopen the debate on welfare priorities, programmes and areas of intervention, on public-private relationship that have been established in many sectors of welfare in the last decades in many European countries. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance welfare programmes capable of recognising the autonomous capacities of the family and informal relations to produce well-being, to cope with the crisis and to produce supportive relationships.Originality/valueThe pandemic highlighted that a progressive reduction of expenditure and politics of retrenchment produced welfare not able to face the needs of a large part of households. The pandemic highlighted that the changes that have taken place in the sphere of work, welfare and of the family in the last years have produced less and less governable effects.

Resilience in crisis: economic coping strategies of informal sector households during the COVID-19 pandemic in Jambi City, Indonesia

“…These strategies are quite effective in reducing expenses. Still, they may not be sufficient to address significant income reductions, as observed in the study of Italian households during the COVID-19 pandemic by Siza (2022). The influence of household socio-economic characteristics on the economic coping strategies of informal sector workers in Jambi City…”

Strategies for Engaging and Outreaching NEETs in Italy: Insights From Active Labour Policies

“…The pandemic-induced economic downturn has resulted in widespread job losses and reduced employment opportunities (Andrei et al, 2022). NEETs, who were already struggling to find employment before the economic crisis (Sergi et al, 2018), now face even greater difficulties (Aina et al, 2021;Cefalo & Scandurra, 2021;Siza, 2022). The closure of businesses, limited job openings, and increased competition for available positions have created a highly challenging environment for these young individuals (Carta & De Philippis, 2021;Cefalo & Scandurra, 2021).…”

Post-COVID-19 poverty in France: magnitude, manifestations and actors from nine case studies

“…, 2020; Han et al. , 2020; Simon and Khambule, 2022; Siza, 2020)⁠. Yet, the size, scope and variety of COVID-19 effects on poverty and inequality are not entirely clear.…”

“…In comparison to the World Bank's pre-coronavirus disease 2019 projections, between 75 and 95 million more people worldwide could be living on less than $1.90 a day by 2022 (Mahler et al, 2022). For the past two years, there has been increasing evidence that the outbreak has placed an economic and social burden on individuals, in addition to its health consequences (Brum and De Rosa, 2021;Buheji et al, 2020;Han et al, 2020;Simon and Khambule, 2022;Siza, 2020). Yet, the size, scope and variety of COVID-19 effects on poverty and inequality are not entirely clear.…”