2023
DOI: 10.1017/nps.2022.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In the Name of “Endangered Nations” and “Unsovereign States”? Official Discourses of Radical Right Movement Parties and Social Movement Organizations in Poland and Germany

Abstract: The political landscape of the radical right has long been a major discussion point in the political and social sciences. By considering the variety of radical right organizations (movement parties and non-parliamentary organizations) and the particular national and transnational political and discursive opportunity structures, the paper aims at a comparative analysis of the main discursive frames present in political programs and manifestoes of radical right social movement organizations and movement parties … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Demonstrations or direct encounters with established political leaders known for their authoritarian and racist statements provided activists with feelings of approachability and emotional reassurance that what they do is correct, expected and socially valuable. Thus, despite the common features of an internalisation of the radical right, we found the sociopolitical contexts to be relevant (see Kajta et al, 2023;cf. Miller-Idriss, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Demonstrations or direct encounters with established political leaders known for their authoritarian and racist statements provided activists with feelings of approachability and emotional reassurance that what they do is correct, expected and socially valuable. Thus, despite the common features of an internalisation of the radical right, we found the sociopolitical contexts to be relevant (see Kajta et al, 2023;cf. Miller-Idriss, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%