2021
DOI: 10.3389/frai.2021.746497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In the Pursuit of Privacy: The Promises and Predicaments of Federated Learning in Healthcare

Abstract: Artificial Intelligence and its subdomain, Machine Learning (ML), have shown the potential to make an unprecedented impact in healthcare. Federated Learning (FL) has been introduced to alleviate some of the limitations of ML, particularly the capability to train on larger datasets for improved performance, which is usually cumbersome for an inter-institutional collaboration due to existing patient protection laws and regulations. Moreover, FL may also play a crucial role in circumventing ML’s exigent bias prob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, distributive learning features such as federated learning can be added to ARCliDS to overcome the small sample size issue. In federated learning approach only the model parameters are shared and data stays within the firewall of individual institutions 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, distributive learning features such as federated learning can be added to ARCliDS to overcome the small sample size issue. In federated learning approach only the model parameters are shared and data stays within the firewall of individual institutions 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, distributive learning features such as federated learning can be added to ARCliDS to overcome the small sample size issue. In federated learning approach only the model parameters are shared and data stays within the firewall of individual institutions 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of standardized terminology regarding DQ aspects in the literature led Kahn et al in 2016 to initiate a harmonized three-category framework stating that each of these categories “conformance”, “completeness”, and “plausibility” can be interpreted in the two contexts of “verification” and “validation” [ 7 ]. Since this framework is well established and used in a large number of scientific papers [ 16 , 21 24 ], the development of the MIRACUM DQ software is also aligned with it. Details on the specific implementation of the various DQ categories in DQAstats are described in a previous publication of the authors [ 20 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%