In the Students’ Own Words: What Are the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Dental School Curriculum?

Abstract

Dental students have little input into the selection of course topics and subject matter included in their dental curricula. Curriculum requirements are framed by the Commission on Dental Accreditation, which has stipulated competencies and associated biomedical and clinical knowledge that must be addressed during dental school. Although these competency requirements restrict the variance of educational experiences, students are eager to share their views on the curriculum within the realm of their educational experience. The objective of this research project was to elicit the perspectives of dental students from a broad crosssection of U.S. and Canadian dental schools about their education. A total of 605 students (285 sophomores, 220 seniors, 100 residents) from twenty North American dental schools completed a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis to communicate their perceptions of the curriculum. Students were also asked to provide their impressions of the overall quality of the educational program in an open-ended written format. The students' qualitative comments were then reviewed and categorized into key issues or themes. Resulting themes for each category of the Curriculum SWOT (C-SWOT) analysis were the following. Strengths: 1) clinical learning experience, and 2) opportunity to work with knowledgeable faculty. Weaknesses: 1) disorganized and inefficient clinical learning environment, 2) teaching and testing that focus on memorization, 3) poor quality instruction characterized by curricular disorganization, and 4) inconsistency among instructors during student evaluations. Opportunities: 1) develop strategies to provide students with more exposure to patients, especially early in the curriculum, and 2) opportunities to learn new technology/techniques. Threats: 1) cost of dental education, 2) students' concerns about faculty "brain drain," i.e., lack of sufficient numbers of dental faculty capable of providing high-quality instruction, and 3) questionable treatment of patients in the dental clinic as a consequence of pursuing procedural requirements. This report presents commentaries selected from 2,421 total responses that communicate students' perspectives related to C-SWOT themes. Students at seven schools in this study reported that they completed all or portions of the first two years of the curriculum in combined classes with medical students. Sophomore and senior students at these schools provided their thoughts on this curricular approach; these perceptions are also reported. Findings from this study are compared to results from a similar investigation of dental student perceptions conducted fifty years ago. We conclude that students participating in this study were positive overall about their learning experiences in dental schools, but identified several areas that appear to be problematic for many students at a variety of different schools including fundamental concerns about instructional quality in some areas of the curriculum. Academic program administrators in ...

Learning experiences of oral hygiene students in the clinical environment

“…The views of students in this study suggested that supervisor qualities had a greater impact on their learning than the assessment tools intended to guide their learning. Positive learning experiences reported that include authentic learning opportunities, the range of patients treated, comprehensiveness of care provided, patient response, respect for autonomy and role modelling of supervisors are consistent with the literature . Literature on clinical teaching behaviours that students found most important include enthusiasm, among dental students , teacher attitudes among nursing students and individual rapport among dental hygiene and dental students .…”

“…It may also explain the apparent contradictions in student experiences of feedback. Students in this study were able to reflect on and articulate the expected behaviours and what they would need to hear from supervisors to support their learning in the clinical environment, and these were consistent with the literature .…”

“…During patient treatment sessions, the clinical teacher occupies the multiple roles of a teacher, a clinical supervisor responsible for the safety of the patient, and of an expert clinician, and is expected to continuously switch between these roles. It has been documented that the behaviour and the approach of clinical teachers may enhance or detract from the learning experience of students .…”

A city‐wide survey of dental students’ opinions on undergraduate oral surgery teaching

“…Besides curricula and clinical assessments, questionnaires might be useful to evaluate students’ self‐confidence regarding oral surgical procedures. Moreover, students' feedback collected via questionnaires is an essential tool for monitoring educational quality and the effectiveness of course content …”

Performance e percepções de estudantes de odontologia no preparo de canais: um estudo de métodos mistos

“…Despite the relevance of these data for the teaching-learning process in endodontics, the low level of evidence generated by in vitro studies precludes a direct extrapolation of findings to the clinical patient care setting. In addition, in the field of Ni-Ti rotary instruments, there is an evident disregard of dental students' opinions, neglecting their role as key elements in the construction of knowledge and in academic discussions 15,16 .…”